people say the build quality is pretty shit

Meanwhile I've got ain telling me to skip the Aurvana Live and go striaght for TFZ King Pro

yeah

imagine only making wrong decisions in your life

thats how it feels to be nitro

I already know why I want the King Pro, mate.

because it looks pretty

Because of good bass response and detail? Besides, I'm a bit of a basshead but I don't go overboard with it.

does it have detail tho

wait for the f5, friend

<:alismirk:230784726615588865>

is that what headfi says <:alismirk:230784726615588865>

So so lost no wonder most people just get beats or Sonys

just try some stuff at a store

and if you like something

buy it online

for less

Few stores have the shite we are talking about

live in singapore

I'll just pick on e and be done with it

Creative is shit, just saying

I've tried the Trio 3 before, they sounded like shit and I hated them.

I don't see the Aurvana sounding any better.

brands =/= product

also yes most of their stuff is shit

just not cal

I mean you could say the same thing about KZ then, but it doesn't apply to them.

thats why most people clarify calv1 not calv2

Most Creative products are horrible. Even their DACs have high OI.

X-Fi Go has 10-20 Ohm OI

For the same price you could buy an SMSL Idea.

til oi is the only quality worth looking for in a dac

There's more, but having high OI is a pain in the dick.

Can't drive sensitive earphones worth shit.

its not the end-be-all like you're trying to paint it as

I mean, there's better build quality on a Trond AC2 than there is in an X-Fi Go.

Ahhh

X-Fi Go is made out of the same chinky plastic you find on a $3 sound card.

And costs close to $60 in Canada.

>buying "better" sound cards instead of improving front or back end audio

tip rolling, tube rolling, dac rolling