Yeah, disagree on that personally.

But yup, that was my point.

fair

I'm not glad he's dead out of some bloodlust I just don't want us to get into "couldn't he just shoot him in the arm" retardism noguns do occasionally

him being dead is cheaper than housing him in prison and he wouldn't ever be a benefit to society for the rest of his life had he been captured alive, so i'm not sure what you would want him alive for

@A. Spader
Sure. And the correct answer to that is "I don't know. I wasn't there. I assume the hero who saved those people used the least amount of force necessary to save lives."

That way you force the shitlib to attack the person saving lives. Which is a bad look.

@Just for youtube [NB1] we should not be considering human life in relations to dollar amount

well this particular person was going to be a dollar amount for the rest of their life

that's the sort of moneychanging callousness that people find disgusting

i would be paying to house them in prison

you can find it disgusting all you'd like, i'm fine with that

Another example would be the case for nationalism.

Which do you think sells better: "Americans deserve their own homeland" or "Mexicans have to go back because they're foreign."?

You're saying the same thing, but one is clearly more palatable

not only that on one you're fighting on your own ground, whereas the other seems to be on your opponent's ground

if the argument is about the Americans, then the nationalists will be perceived as the ones with the moral high ground. If the argument is about the Mexicans and their plight, then those arguing in their favor will be perceived as the ones with the moral high ground

🤔🤔🤔

Hurry up and civil war already

Never gonna happen.

not gonna stop governor blackface from trying

Tbf, blackface is pretty based.

Ziclops Dan has to go back.

based af

lmao Ziclops

Highly disagree a civil war could never happen. We're not even 250 years ago from 2 violent revolutions/civil wars on our soil. Even if whites don't want it, the browns and blacks will start it.

Suburban America being fat and happy means nothing when 80IQ nogs and mestizos are told from birth that white man is the enemy and should be punished for historical racism and colonialism

an actual war breaking out would be horrible, because at this point there would not be one or two factions. There'd be tons, all with their own grievances and reasons for operating the way they do

I didn't say it couldn't. I said it won't.

a modern civil war would resemble what happened in afghanistan more than what happened in 1776 or 1861

@Unironic Ohio Supremecist 🤷‍♂️

Also, I would put a race war in a separate category from a Civil War. And I think that's all.but inevitable.

eh

a war along racial lines for racial reasons seems even less likely than an armed conflict against the current government

at least here in America

Civil war divided on racial lines is going to be the powder keg ultimately. It won't be 100% of each race competing but the vast majority will. Whites on the right are quickly becoming more polarized and once the fight or flight kicks in (See: When the Saxon began to hate) you'll see a conflict become two sided

Right now to say that blacks,mestizos, jews and even most asians are not hoping to see whites extinct in their own countries is naive as it is retarded. Whites aren't legally allowed to be proud of themselves and are in a slow demoralization campaign being waged via social programming.