Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 414638979422355477
was looking for the link to this Discord, and found this first https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/comments/7nkaw6/debunk_some_of_matt_christiansens_videos_please/
`I find that guy insufferable. He does exactly as you say, puts on a reasonable facade while tossing out oceans of questionable right wing interpretations of reality to his adoring fans.
An echo chamber that is beneath the radar from increased scrutiny so far. Would love some people taking him down a few pegs.`
lol 4 posts. I expected worse from plebbit
Lets get him on the show.
I thought David Pak would be good but then he starts to advoate shit like, Socialism works, look at the Bible, perfect example or in his newest video, he won't talk to people who say "Guns don't kill people, people kill people"
Another of his video is "White Privilege is real"
I have never seen one of his videos... but that sounds horrible
i don't regret defending him during the Reza Aslann situation, but he's dismissive of conservative arugements at times
"Communism is a right wing perversion of socialism" - David Pakman
sigh
everything bad is right, everything good is left, now give the nice "moderate" your cash
I'm progressionism and that's good. Conservatives are bad news for all of us
How dare people like things I dont like, amirite comrade?
To the gulags with you!
david pakman misquotes are the only redeeming factor, and it doesnt redeem much of anything really
On a serious note, conservatism is just the worst name for people to have used...
because it is defined withholding something, where is liberalism, is freeing something, progressivism, to advance something. A freeing or advancing expressions is normally seen as better than a constrictive expression.
how would you redefine holding to current or traditional values?
or rather what term would you use for it, because redefine implies a change in composition rather than label
I would never describe it that way, it is not about holding but creating the vision of our forefathers.
thats a bit of a semantic nitpick isnt it?
and I dont see Liberalism as the counter to Conservatism in the original sense, just in the modern corruption of the terms
where Liberal now just means leftist, and what was Liberal now falls under the wide Libertarian umbrella
but when you get down to it most classical liberals and conservatives fall down to semantics. dave rubin with anyone kinda proves this
I've always thought of progressive/conservative as a different discussion to classical liberal vs leftist/socialist
so maybe that's why I'm not seeing much of an issue
so the question will really be now that Classical liberal possibly might shift into liberalist, will it have a defined effect on those who identify themselves by those titles. while the Strong forceful name of Liberalist be change them or will they still be seen as the old guard of the past
liberalist is just a meme movement
I dont really see it going anywhere but I dont mind that people are getting more politically active
So was Republican, we can never tell when things start if it will change the world.
http://regulations.delaware.gov/register/november2017/proposed/21%20DE%20Reg%20364%2011-01-17.pdf
The State of Delaware is allowing anyone to identify as any gender or race...?
`7.4 All students enrolled in a Delaware public school may self-identify gender or race which is maintained in eSchoolPLUS.`
Step 1. Everyone identifies as a genderfluid person of colour
Step 2. Everyone acts like the biggest "privileged shitlord" they can
Step 3. When called out as "fakes", each shitlord must point out that race is a "social construct", so there are no inherent "white" traits and that their accuser is a racist
Won't change much, but it would be funny to watch people squirm over it
i would tick ALL the boxes.
You madman
have you just assumed that i have a gender? 😄
well... i would have ALL the genders 😄