Message from @aguyyouknow
Discord ID: 562707341628276764
Also surprising no one
Maxine water is one of the most disgusting American politicians to me. She has a long history of stoking racial violence going back to the LA riots.
Issuing the Mueller report in its entirety is illegal. Is Nadler advocating for doing something illegal? Shouldn't he be charged with something?
Maxine Waters is a dumb cunt.
Trending on GofundMe The Battle For Free Speech
Operation: Kill Switch
www.OperationKillSwitch.com
Launch Episode | File Number 18-004212
https://soundcloud.com/quigginreport/operation-kill-switch-1le
YouTube Trailer: https://youtu.be/jMdHVs_ib9A
Help US Fight Back
Psycho
He almost has a moment of self-reflection when he realizes that he was the only person yelling at this poor man
But he attributes that to them behind complicit and not him being a psychopath
Doesn't even realize they are being the facist
He's clearly psychotic and has a tenuous grasp on reality
She just doesn’t understand how the government work https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/04/02/aoc-on-wh-clearances-what-is-next-putting-nuclear-codes-in-instagram-dms/
Someone is going to start a show called. This quote is from AOC or Zoolander...
She just doesn't understand ~~how the government works~~ anything
FTFY
Source interview:
https://www.futurity.org/universal-background-checks-states-2022782-2/
Main take away. Its about who has the guns, not what kind of guns.
"I believe that the three most important things that lawmakers can do to reduce gun violence in their home states are to pass laws that: one, require universal background checks; two, prohibit gun purchase or possession by anyone with a history of violence, whether it be a felony or a misdemeanor; and three, provide a mechanism, called red flag laws, to address people who are at an extreme risk of committing violence, not only to other people but to themselves."
they tell you right away that the person proposing the law has 0 respect for the second amendment
So One is mostly implemented, except in the case of some private sales. Two is actually being hindered by the left and their soft on crime stances. and Three, red flag laws already got an innocent person killed and can be weaponized
I think a proper red flag law would only apply in a case where charges are being filed, not just some person calling in. This should also be accompanied by stronger prosecution of false accusation, so there's a penalty for someone trying to weaponize the law.
"Thank you for standing up against the fascists. Don't let the latte liberals in the responses get you down. Silence is consent. Fascists go home!"
Comment from that facebook post, crazy motherfuckers
"Yeah I agree with the people saying you shouldn't have started anything unless he did first. We're not them. We're not the disgusting, racist hateful right"
even better one, they are sold on the lie that right does this shit to them which justifies it to themselves when they act like cunts
he is all over the comments justifying his actions too
Completely oblivious
they are just shy of inciting violence
Harassment at the very least
yep
I've got to get myself a MAGA hat
should get a hat that reads AGAM instead. I bet they'll still get #triggered
🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔
This would make taxes so complicated there would be no hope for the average person to be able to do them https://www.wsj.com/articles/top-democrat-proposes-annual-tax-on-unrealized-capital-gains-11554217383
Reduce the tax system to a simple, straightforward set of rules
Its all about punishing the wealthy not helping the poor
It doesn't even do that well, generally
Sounds like Yang is actually going to be on Ben shapiro's sunday special. Regardless of how the show turns out I give him credit for going on and not just sticking to media thats going to kiss his rear. Although, given how far back he is in the poles going on the show probably makes sense.
This tax would absolutely be purely to penalize. Its only reasoning is seeking equality for equality's sake. Tim Pool actually talked in a video about why he supports progressive taxation (different but I think the logic applies here). He's honest about it being mostly to stop the rich from becoming "too" rich more so than the need for the money anywhere. It's probably a more steel man argument for it, but it still treats income equality as an inherit good, which I'm not convinced is the case