Message from @Louis Carlos Fer

Discord ID: 626157465041633283


2019-09-24 14:17:21 UTC  

You gotta use 'backticks' to make something look like `this`. If you're on desktop it's that key to the left of your number row

2019-09-24 14:20:17 UTC  

Or you can put > in front of it to make it a "quote"
> Like this

2019-09-24 15:30:38 UTC  

@Deleted User
*"how do you folks do the thing where the quoted text is different?"*
Like this:
*"(H)ow do you (people show) where the quoted text is different?"*
*... marionette strings... 😂*

2019-09-24 17:58:07 UTC  

Titania for pres 2024 😉

2019-09-24 18:50:29 UTC  

This news makes me want a chicken sandwich

2019-09-24 19:28:58 UTC  

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-49816205 another victim of the trigger culture

2019-09-24 19:29:06 UTC  

fuckin children

2019-09-24 19:52:41 UTC  

I got tired of this 'absolute moral authority' horseshit during the Bush administration. I'm sorry for their loss, but those people can go fuck themselves if they think it gives them some special authority to opine on movies and such.

2019-09-24 20:32:27 UTC  
2019-09-24 20:42:04 UTC  

"To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas."

2019-09-24 20:42:19 UTC  

Saved a click. What orwellian crazy talk

2019-09-24 20:43:31 UTC  

They want thought police.

2019-09-24 20:43:35 UTC  

Yeah that’s dumb.

2019-09-24 20:44:25 UTC  

I dislike racist, like all normal people but this is clearly thought policing.

2019-09-24 20:46:13 UTC  

I like the idea of people formally trained on racism. It's a funny sort of concept

2019-09-24 20:46:24 UTC  

Gotta go to racism school, Timmy

2019-09-24 20:46:30 UTC  

how is it thought policing?

2019-09-24 20:46:48 UTC  

"The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas."

2019-09-24 20:46:59 UTC  

That last bit

2019-09-24 20:47:28 UTC  

They want to monitor what officials say for expressions of racist ideas. Pretty much the definition of thought control

2019-09-24 20:47:35 UTC  

hold on

2019-09-24 20:48:58 UTC  

how is it **THOUGHT** policing? they never say they are policing people's thoughts, just their words and action. We all know words and actions have consequences.

2019-09-24 20:51:12 UTC  

Speech is thought, and in this country we have the right to free speech. Policing speech is policing thought. If the electorate wishes to not re-elect an official because of idiotic or racist statements, such is their business and should be viewed as nothing less than the proper action of a democratic society whereas having topdown government control of what those elected are allowed to say is a severe violation of the first amendment

2019-09-24 20:51:18 UTC  

It's seriously not cash money

2019-09-24 20:51:22 UTC  

Your words are protected by 1a, how do you measure the racism of an action?

2019-09-24 20:51:49 UTC  

wut

2019-09-24 20:51:51 UTC  

Probably by the level of hurt fee-fees

2019-09-24 20:51:54 UTC  

i'm not even gonna read that

2019-09-24 20:52:01 UTC  

By “trained experts”

2019-09-24 20:52:02 UTC  

you said speech is thought

2019-09-24 20:52:06 UTC  

thats stupid

2019-09-24 20:52:29 UTC  

How is speech not thought? It's merely the outward expression of thought and is the primary means by which thought is formed and changed

2019-09-24 20:52:43 UTC  

It's also the basis of a democratic society

2019-09-24 20:52:56 UTC  

Is speech violence, @Clive ?

2019-09-24 20:55:12 UTC  

@Clive I think we have a different understanding of words in the english language