Message from @Putz
Discord ID: 615626002005229581
You can't comment at all...
in #xenoi you can
and #the long walls
Oh.
bro youre gonna get roasted hard in there lol @Mandatory Carry
Anybody else here a commercial driver per chance?
Just went through a Costa vida order. They asked if I wanted black or pinto beans. I asked for beans of colour and am offended.
Has anyone taken the comptia Security+ 501 test revently?
any of you guys in dallas going to the sabaton concert? i has no frens to go with.
i dont think thats the thing that makes me a nazi. pretty sure its the uniform.
Thanks, @Agent Smith! 👌
@Leman Russ, @Shire!
Didn't mean to bail on vc, network went out (again) so I'm on data. 😒😔
No biggy man! Good talkin!
Related to Ion Fury:
<https://twitter.com/Nifflas/status/1166024631784005632>
```Censorship is something forcefully imposed against one's will by someone in a more powerful position.```
Oh no, are we doing the racism thing with censorship too?
ah crap seriously?
although, it does require having authority to enforce any censorship
Censorship does not require force. You can use social influence to invoke self censorship. Its still censorship, i think the term censorship has to reflect the motivation to do it. If nifflas changes something to comply with personal belief then it is not censorship. If your doing it as a response to outside pressures, it is censorship
The fact things are created and then removed would indicate it is a done based on outside forces (if it was principaled you never would habe thought/considered it to start with)
censorship absolutely requires force. self censorship is simply capitulation to those that wield that force
well i originally used the word authority
and i still think thats a better word
in this instance the publisher is the one that has authority over the game devs
Censorship does not require authority or force
how could it not?
Because you can censor based on influence, influence does not require authority or force
how do you censor based on influence?
Seems like a largely semantic argument
Threat of boycott could cause censorship, but isn't a form of force or authority, I suppose
its a threat of financial harm
You can choose to censor to avoid a diacussion about the subject as an example. There is no force
I don't talk about killing nazis in front of children. That is a form of censorship not based on force or authority
i dont see how that can be censorship if you do not desire to say it
nor are you compelled not to say it
Its self censorship, because i do desire to say it
you can say it, but you choose not to.
i dont think thats equivalent
nor does that disprove the need to have authority over someone in order to censor
It is equilevent because the motive for the censor matters
how?