Message from @C1PHER
Discord ID: 616608292986290176
Basically. The entire city is run by them, funded by whites and destroyed by them in return
damn crackers
Being a white working male in the Western world feels like being a pack mule carrying apes up a mountain towards food and shelter all while being berated and beaten along the way to go faster
@Clive
The last NAzI soldier was born a week after HITLER'S suicide;
NAzIism, you see, is an idea, not a thing that can be destroyed. As long as there are beleivers, there will be soldiers. Saying otherwise would require that Americans stop calling ourselves democratic repulcicans, as the last of WASHINGTON'S Era (Elizabeth HAMILTON) died out somewhere during the War Of 1812.
You are free to choose your mind from here.
we have stopped calling ourselves democratic republicans....
It's still our government system. *shrug*
yeah i'm over this debate
it was dumb, sorry for bringing it up
HELP I got a message in the roll call saying "Your message could not be delivered because you don't share a server with the recipient or you disabled direct messages on your shared server, recipient is only accepting direct messages from friends, or you were blocked by the recipient."
What did I do wrong?
Fixed 🙂
Can violence against conservatives be justified?
Same way you can justify violence against anyone.
ok justify violence against a democratic voter
Are you asking me to justify violence against them for the act of voting for the Democratic party?
yea
like for a republican voter
Then I can't. And the same would apply to a Republican voter
I mean votes are actions I wouldn't be thought policing
I can
it depends on your position of course
myself I couldn't
Voting is not speech?
but if I was a Daca child, trans person, an illegal, I could easily
voting is not speech
saying you voted it speech
like saying you killed someone is speech
you can only inductively reason that someone open about their political views vote a particular way
Voting is an endorsement of a candidate or an idea, which seems to me like it would be an act of speech
What you're suggesting sounds like "you endorsed a Bad Thing and now I can say you did that Bad Thing and use violence against you to stop the Bad Thing"
no because someone's action of voting Trump into office has responsibility for the increased drone strikes in Yemen
for example
the actions of the person you vote for would be your doing to a degree
small maybe, doesn't mean your actions do not effect people in your country and out of it
and I might argue if for example the founder of pragerU never voted his actions of lying and propaganda would be enough means to that end as well I think. I would have to think about it more
Still sounds like punishing wrongthink to me
wrong think all you want
don't vote for it
this is an action
So if I just keep all my opinions secret I'm safe from the thought police?