Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 626279177137422336
Do they just disappear and die or something
I don't think it's a 5/10 split.
That's what it said in the abstract
There are no numbers in the abstract.
Half the variably of childhood income is explained by parental income.
It said the wealth of rich parents affects the wealth of their adult children
The rest of the variability is unexplained by that factor.
Yeah, obviously.
We're trying to figure out how much.
it just says they wont be low income it doesn't say anything about how high they went
What does "low income" mean?
but in canada
it is 1/3
uhhh
Is there some number that if you make a penny less than you're low income and if you make a penny more than you're high income?
So ultimately what does the paper try to say?
Across countries, an X amount of kids end up sharing the same socioeconomic strata as their parents
where you are born is a good prediction of how you will live your life
...And?
It doesn't say anything. You have to read it.
I think birth right is bullshit
Fuck off to the wilderness then
Do you think that parents don't have a special bond with their children?
Stop getting your parents to provide for you
Pay them back for the effort of raising you
wut
that has nothing to do with this
Did I stutter
Fucken lol
What do you mean exactly by "birthright"?
Of course it does
stuttering would imply you actually have the confidence to join voice chat once in awhile
Why would it be wrong for a parent to help their child with their wealth?
I think it means "nontangible inheritance" but maybe you mean something else.
Riddle me this
Okay, since you're the one who obviously stays in his basement for a fucken living you mind staying up another seven hours for when I get home?
It's wrong for parents to help their children because it makes them weak. It's not the Spartan way.
Throw your children into the wolf pit.
It's an interesting statistic to be sure but ultimately it doesn't really say much in terms of policy
nah I work nights so I'm on, on my days off