Incorporating is not very hard, unless you're working in something where you have specific legal concerns I don't get it.

You know there are solutions to the immigration question.

Like, not even extreme ones.

Death squads?

The only issue is political will, and that's growing every day.

is it?

how do you measure political will?

Look at the Groyper War.

What's that got to dow ith the normie general public?

People say shit based on internet bullthit and I zone out immediately.

it's like when people talk about what's happening on twitter as if it's relevant in terms of the mood of the country.

Can you imagine people talking about demographics at conservative events getting standing O's even 5 years ago?

That's still a minimal portion of the population

What percentage of the voting public do they actually represent?

The voting public? Pretty damn high.

Most people don't vote.

more people vote than have active twitter accounts, or go to these political events.

How many political events do you attend?

Trump got in by being openly nationalist and dog whistling about race.

And got in with extremely fervent support.

meh

I'm not sure what to think about "dogwhistles"

He said all kinds of shit

like how the military should use motorcylce couriers

These dogwhistles dont seem to be very effective to me if it's mostly rabid bluechecks who hear them 🤔

>just lay down and die
Are you Jewish by any chance?

@Beemann
*psst* That's the point.

>if you dont agree with me you think we should die
Real honest take there champ

Lolwut?

>the point of a dogwhistle is to have it heard by non-dogs

Can you genuinely not read?

>the point of racist dog whistles ISN'T to be heard by racially conscious people
Lolwut

Denial that a certain tactic should or will pay off is not "lol let's just give up"
Although I suppose that also depends on what that tactic means to your objective, given ideological restrictions

Especially with people from Ohio where Obama just dumped like 500k African Muslims over the years they definitely responded to some of his statements like the travel ban.

But they also had their small towns destroyed by the government dropping 5k African Muslims on welfare at a time into the state.

So the point of Trump's rhetoric was to make people mad as he fails to build a wall and has no public problem with legal immigration (so long as your country doesn't have verification issues), and then rally the left around crazies?
Or was it just a massive fuck up?

Anyone who thought the wall would be done in 4 years is a retard.

Things rarely happen that fast in a big corporation, let alone in the Government with antagonists everywhere.

I mean I would argue the same for any big govt project, but it still happens

Yeah, but it's even worse since he's not just fighting the Double Government he's fighting the elected politicians too.

Sure, but I doubt he couldn't have accounted for that, for one
And for another, if you're going to talk up your dealmaking the public is going to want to see tangible results. You have to maintain reasonable expectations