Yeah, that case is the best example. How about not raping people....

Too easy to not rape people apparently.

since when is Rubin a debater and not an interviewer?

He's been trying to interact with leftist audience members like Ben Shapiro does while on his tour with Jordan Peterson.

Except that he doesn't have the thirst for blood that Shapiro does, so he's been doing terrible at it.

it is kind of deliberate

hence the "no one is coming or you"

I really need to sit down and watch some of that. I'm about 3 weeks behind on Matt and Blonde's proper channels. I keep hearing about the Rubin thing, but I've only seen a quick 15 second clip of it

i watched the whole thing (or the hour on his channel) while there are a few things where he could/should have reacted differently you can clearly see that he acts based on his principles.

It is a hard watch, and not because of him. The "actvists" (or idiots, depending on your word choice) really have no idea what they are talking about.

No, they don't. But not everyone has the same snap-finger level of knowledge to deal with them, either. Shapiro is a blessing for our movement

I've got the original video bookmarked to watch later. But what I can say now that I've watched Matt's video is that I'm glad that thus far it doesn't seem like Dave got angry

That's the end goal of these protesters. To get the speaker angry enough to lash out

yeah... he did not do that

i'm not sure if he is even capable of being angry 😉

Rubin Report has been on my "To Watch" list since Matt put Freedom Toons on B&tB

But lately I've been putting 60-70 hours a week in, and only getting paid for 42

It's just like that Netflix subscription that my sister uses

i watch it from time to time, depends on the guest

he does a really good job at ah-gree-ing with people 😉

I actually watched the show the first time to see if he actually talked like that

but seriously: if you want people to hang themselves with their own stupidity, Dave is your man 😄

yeah mostly because he has nothing particularly intelligent to say himself

he does not have to... he is not a "debater" but an "interviewer"

Two new bombings one in Paris the second more deadly in Indonesia:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/13/world/asia/indonesia-church-suicide-bomber.amp.html

well, if you're going to be a speaker you could put in modicum of effort into defending your viewpoint.

He was trying to draw out their viewpoint. They offered no real attack against his

So what would he be defending against?

Unfortunately, again if you're going to speak publicly and are a prominent figure for political views then he needs to be able to defend them, not just draw out far left opinions.

What is he defending against?

The opposite political viewpoint.

Which is?

There were virtually no viewpoints stated, and the ones that were ended up just being vague insubstantial bullshit

How does one defend against nothing?

You can still deconstruct their claims. You're oversimplifying it imo

Deconstruct them with what? That which is claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence

All Rubin did was make them look dumb by simply allowing them to express themselves

Like the woman who actually responded with "fuck you pay me" and then who rejected payment

Sorry my discord is acting up.

You can deconstruct their premise no matter how dumb it is. Shapiro does it all the time.

And yeah he actually did get that one chick good. Pay me then I tell you my totally non made up oppression story 😂

Shapiro often just talks over them