Message from @Chump_or_Champ
Discord ID: 447411120504832010
You would think they'd make arguments against his actual positions
Not pull Cathy Newman tier shit
It takes effort to actually understand Peterson, active listening
I think a lot of those "media types" are actually incapable of that.
It really doesn't tbh
You don' t think so?
It's a lot of, I don't want to say dumbed down, but certainly more simplified and clearly worded Nietzsche and Jung
Everything's a metaphor, there's consistency within mythology, you are your own saviour, sort yourself out
Yes, but all the details are still there if you actively listen. If you listen carefully his word choices tell you most everything those philo'sophers he's basing it off of also said.
There's a lot of missing Nietzsche actually though I haven't watched every single one of his lectures
Doing so would take more time than just rereading TSZ
It's when he seems to go scattered in his thought train that you can pick up what he isn't saying.
he doesn't do that as much anymore
I feel like you're overcomplicating Peterson tbh
no, just actively listen, watch him fight for the right words and consider why he fought for those words.
He's popular because his work is easily digestible (outside of his academic work)
I like it. I started listening to the podcast a few weeks ago
Thanks for the responses
I find myself just rolling my eyes when I read the article and the comments and just dismissing it.
I guess the discomfort is I didn't even care to go through the intellectual "rigor" to argue their points/position.
I mean considering it's basically all strawmen there's not much rigor needed lol
fucking microsoft wonders why no one wants to install the windows updates
I need call in show now
Must have
Intellectual discussion and slightly assholish humor in waiting room chat. I'm in a glass case of emotionnnn
I don't get to do waiting room voicechat 😦
This Munk debate on political correctness is a trashing of the left.
They've got two intellectuals up there, and they keep just falling back on "muh identity politics has been hurt in the past, trump is stupid."
Meanwhile, JBP and Fry keep just saying, "Political correctness is harming enlightenment values, removing them from society in favor of real harm to ordinary people for speech.".... they come back with more "Muh identity, Trump!"
„the left“ still has intellectuals?
Well, a black identity politics church preacher and a feminist.
To be fair, the entire debate panel is leftist, even Peterson.
Not a conservative among them, and this is "debate"
Lmao thanks, Stefan Molyneux
I was just watching this Munk debate
https://youtu.be/GxYimeaoea0 for those who are interested.
Holy cow every word out of this black mans mouth makes me hate him. His entire perspective is group-identity
"It's hard to be a self-deprecating englishman"... jesus...
Just fucking deal with the IDEAS for one second