Message from @Holo
Discord ID: 495744202638884864
i watched some clips from Ben shapiro
ha ha
it was hilarious
I usually don't like Graham either.
"Do you want to comment more on that?"
"No."
Graham grew testicles
HA HA HA HA
HOLY MOLY
this is great
Yeah. I said that Graham found his balls in that hearing.
those 'nos' are great
"Honest":
no: 70
yes: 30
Believable:
no: 67
yes: 37
Leaving out some critical data from the polls aren't you little slimeball journalist
Yeah these questions are framed like shit
well actually those are from this question
Hey, would someone be willing to help me out? I've got a friend on Facebook that's trying to debate the Kavanaugh thing. I need some links to sources here if anyone has them.
What are the points?
"Which of the following words would you use to describe Christine ford in Thursday's hearing"
What are they attempting to demonstrate?
"so the friend you're likely talking about here is Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was at the party with her. Keyser has said that she does not remember the specific party, primarily because she did not know of the assault happening at the time. it wasn't an important event to her. BUT she has said that she DOES BELIEVE Dr. Ford and has since said that she will cooperate with an fbi investigation.
now, regarding the fbi investigation. an fbi investigation would prove the allegations' falsehood far better than the supposed "holes" in Ford's story (which, like I said, aren't there). if kavanaugh hasn't done anything, an fbi investigation would literally be one of the best ways to prove his innocence. and if Ford is lying, an fbi investigation would open her up to getting a false statement's felony. seems like a really weird thing to ask for if she's lying, and seems like a really weird thing to not ask for if kavanaugh is telling the truth."
^That's his double post
Like it's 2006
Tell him that's not the point though, quote the fact that the FBI doesn't do anything a senate judiciary hearing can't do
The fact of the matter is that an FBI hearing is simply stalling
He doesn't believe it's stalling. I'd feel safer attacking the position that Dr. Ford doesn't have holes in her story.
Because I feel like that's more defensible.
The hole in her story is that there's no story
She claim to not like flying but flies more in year than 50% of americans
and what buckshot just said
I was at X place at Y time with Z people and then A person pushed me into a room with B people and kavanaugh happened to be one of them
^ her story
All persons do not remember incident (and swore on affidavits)
except her
Another thing you can do is the equilivancy test, ask them how they'd treat it if someone accused them of murder 30 something odd years ago and demanded they be put in jail
no evidence
everyone they claim as a witness denies it
and all they have is a bunch of people saying they 'believe' them
do you think it'll hold up in court?