@SteelandSouls yeah, but it wasn’t in Canada; it was in Sweden

Sounds like a Swedish thing to do

Organisers were condemned as “far-right” and “xenophobic” because reasons

Apparently three years ago or some shit

Nothing says far-right like walking around with a leather strap-on in front of children

Just so we’re clear: traps are not gay

All joking aside, that’s some serious hoolahoops in thinking there

It's only a trap if you fall for one. The feels before reals crowd tends to have trouble with that whole thinking problem

Mmmm

On that discussion though: what do you think about the whole thing?

My commentary on the LGBTQAAIP2+EIEIO thing is that some day it'll get so long that they make an acronym out of the acronym so that it's pronounceable, and hopefully by that point people will forget what it even means, and then the movement itself will be forgotten as well.

About traps etc

@wolfman1911 lmao

Super gay

My thought on traps is no thanks.

Plausible, and terrifyingly so

Mmmm

I don’t like the whole idea being centred around deception

So wait. In the traps are gay debate (it's not really a debate but whatever) is the person accused of being gay the person who IS the trap or the person who FALLS FOR the trap?

I dunno... maybe both?

I think uncertainty over that is half the problem.

It’s one of those weird wordplays

^ yeah pretty much

I’ve had to translate porn before where it’s like

The trap is gay because he’s out there pretending to be female to be fucked by men

If it's the latter, then it depends on how far along they go. Traps still retain their pivotal pelvis parts so it's not like they won't know its there.

Undoubtedly the trap is gay

If we are going with the Roman model, banging a trap isn't gay, but getting banged by a trap is super gay.

But at the same time, wouldn’t finding out that someone’s a dude then proceeding to have intercourse with them despite that make you gay?

@wolfman1911 makes sense

By that logic, it ain't gay if you bang a dude in a wig

By my standards, rubbing your dick against something else with a dick is pretty gay, even if the dicks aren't in contact.

^ common sense

Or rather should be

All gay couples who are the top in their relationship is actually straight

Well the thing about the Romans is that you know how everyone always talks about how they were accepting of homosexuality and all? That's not true at all. They didn't care what you were putting your dick into, so long as you were the one putting a dick into something.

Here's a question for you to play with. Is masturbating gay?

Well, I can answer that question with another question. Is one a prime number?

I'd say yes

I wouldn’t say so, considering it’s a simulation of intercourse with, presumably, a person of the opposite sex

But it's not though. If you're a dude, it's a dude's hand giving you an HJ