Personally, I like shotgunning. I think its more fun to shoot things that move. I recommend it if you have a place to shoot trap, skeet or sporting clays near you.

We *probably* do, but it's a bit up in the air in urban Canada

Ah yeah we do

Most place can have trap and skeet. After all they're in the Olympics.

I'm a trap, you can have me

😉

To the Editor:

Re “Hillary Clinton’s Master Class in Distraction,” by Michelle Cottle (Editorial Observer, Oct. 18):

So it’s not enough that Hillary Clinton had the 2016 presidential election stolen from her by James Comey, Russia and an electoral system so unfair and outmoded as to award victory to a candidate who lost the popular vote by almost three million votes. It’s not enough that the first woman to be a major-party presidential candidate in history had to endure decades of hatred and efforts to destroy her by the Republicans, building up to the grand finale fireworks display of “Lock her up!”

Now she’s supposed to just shut up and go away? With friends like The New York Times’s editorial page, rehashing the same old garbage, who needs Fox News?

Jonah Winter
Pittsburgh

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

I'm literally dying

I'll never understand the ones who think Hillary was pure. That's just delusional.

I voted for her in 2016

In retrospect, I'm glad she lost

I'm not saying people who voted for her. I can understand the people who thought of her as better or lesser of two evils. Its the people who thought of her as pure, when there's a track record of things like not supporting free speech (flag burning, video games, rap music), against gay marriage (and claiming on NPR that she always supported it), supporting the Iraq war (in a senate vote), supporting intervention in Libya (and laughing about it).
To be fair, no one should think of any politician as pure. I mean does anyone here think Trump has never done anything wrong? I am sure everyone here has their problems with him. and not just the "he doesn't go hard enough" type criticism.

Trump is no saint

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/immigration/2018/10/28/who-organized-migrant-caravan-headed-united-states/1804008002/
*There is nothing political here
Coordinators with Pueblo Sin Fronteras say the caravan operates with no hierarchy but rather by consensus.
Each evening, after the sun goes down, and the oppressive heat dissipates, migrants are invited to the center of town to listen to plans put forth by volunteer coordinators.
“They are given a chance to agree or disagree. No decision is made without the input of our collaborators,” Nelly Espinoza, a volunteer with Pueblo Sin Fronteras, said of the migrants traveling with the caravan.*
That sound a lot like organizing a caravan to me. I can't seem to find the source of funding for this "Pueblo Sin Fronteras" group does anyone have info?

Not many people supported Hillary on a deep level. There's just no way. It was only about voting blue and being anti-Trump

@grant with your mic I would guess an M3 😀

@grant @ClashOfChampions totally agree trump was definitely not my first choice. People with my perspective (conservative Christian) have been left high and dry for as long as I can remember.

@grant should we call their planning structure Democratic anarcho-caravanism? Lol

The thing is tho. Trump began to grow on me after the election.

I started looking into him and some of the stuff said about him

And I looked into his policies and I slowly grew to like

Wow the politicon panel with Michael Knowles and 3 leftists is so aggravating. Roaming is on the panel too but is so useless, no help at all

It was pretty much Michael vs 3 hysterical douchebags

And the guy next to Michael keeps touching him when he disagrees

I had to stop watching that one. It was so obvious that the guy on the far right wasn't making any good faith arguments, and just wanted to take shots at Christians. I'm not Christian, but I hate people like that.

Ah, as in, the guy who was sitting on the far end. Yeah. They were such virtue signaling turds

I don't get why Roaming takes front line positions when she is not a face for the front line. If anything she's more like a combat medic. You take your lumps, go to her to patch up what you were weak on in the debate, go out and find again

She was profoundly pathetic in that one. Even went against a couple of Michaels points. Its like, bitch, get off the stage. You're overrated and do nothing

I dont actually have a problem with her, but she just pissed me off so much

So, to be fair. Politicon is where ideas are hashed out in a gladitorial arena, not for casual discussion which is what she would be ideal at.

I think she might be playing in fields too big for her

She looks traumatized, too

Reserved, disturbed

Politicon is for the people ready to savage their opponents.

She get Harvey Weinsteined or something?

Not everyone is cut out for the battlefield. Lord knows, I'm not so I won't hold it against her if she's not. But the difference is that she should know her limits. I get her zeal in the endeavor but she just doesn't have that weight to swing around

Yeah, someone else probably had to bow out and so she was asked to go on, or something

Definitely not a gladiator type

To me her job is to be the softer calmer side. She might be good for interviewing people.

If you ain't ready to stand up and DESTROY someone, there's no point in being on a Politicon stage