Message from @wail
Discord ID: 513785426784288773
That's not particularly true since there are cameras literally everywhere, but I've never seen a sticker saying, "You are being recorded" in WalMart
And Google et al tell you what you're signing over. The issue is how EULA's and TOS's are handled
Maybe it's off in the break room
So lets say I walk into the Amazon store with an electronic signal jammer
Anything wrong with that?
Canada requires that you have a sign, to my knowledge. If the States doesn't you're probably getting cucked
And I'd assume that signal jamming is banned in such a store, and the TOS likely include not sabotaging their entire system
So it's okay for the arms race to go in one direction, but not for people to take precautions against intrusions of privacy by corporate entities
Gotcha
>why isn't it okay for me to jam signals in a store that operates entirely based on automation and item scanning?
Is this a ruse?
How is it any different than an employee watching you while you’re in the store?
The employee probably doesn't have a photographic memory and replay function
Humans aren't perfect recording devices with immutable memory?
That’s not the point.
People are already watching you on their private property.
It’s a matter of protecting their assets.
Sure. I don't have a problem with that
I do have a problem with making a society where you can't do anything without having data collected about your activity and sent to go reside in various different profiles by the govt & corporate entities for all time.
But your solution is to give government some level of control over those data collection entities, when the government is one of their customers lol
What's my solution again?
I was under the impression that it involved pushing for regulation
Data collection and consolidation, as per your comment on these info databases not being allowed
And your comment about average people not being tech savvy enough for the market solution
And the IBoR stuff
I certainly don't feel like I have a solution, just pointing out that laissez faire attitudes towards this are extremely dangerous
If it isn’t from the private company or from the government, then it will be from ordinary citizens. How pictures of ‘Walmart people’ have you seen.
Most of the SJWs we all laugh at are being filmed without their consent
Voice to text doesn’t understand southern. Lol
This is mostly from individual people with cellphones
Not government or corporations
A digital bill of rights can protect from the ramifications with increasing digital data.
@J Edgar back in the day, would you have been aware that liberal ideas most likely lead to a gynocentric society?
People shouldn’t be fired for words or actions that are not illegal.
That's ultimately why it's never justified to have liberal ideals, imo
It's probably the things that me and my Aussie buddy butt heads the most, the idea that women should be completely equal to men
Factually they aren't, so don't pretend it's so
Too often moral fagging lends itself to the idea that they can be functional equals, it's absurd
Because two things can't be true at once in the mind of a liberal
They don’t understand the difference between equality in opportunity and equality of outcomes. The also think that being a stay at home mom makes a woman inferior (because they are the sexist ones).
Yeah, the minute you say that perhaps certain people should be used for certain purposes based on what they're good at, "OH SO WOMEN SHOULD ONLY BE BABY MAKERS REEEEEEE"
Even the most levelheaded of liberals will use it against you