Message from @lettsface

Discord ID: 552656938945740812


2019-03-05 22:36:06 UTC  

yes and no, imagine how much shit would go down if something fundamental like relativity were disproven?

2019-03-05 22:36:16 UTC  

The difference between that and the Bible is that the only way to deal with "oh, it would be impossible for the earth to flood and for 2 of every animal to get onto a boat" is to handwave

2019-03-05 22:36:20 UTC  

Or if someone proved that gender is binary 😛

2019-03-05 22:36:22 UTC  

It wouldn't be entirely disproven

2019-03-05 22:36:53 UTC  

It might be that some aspect of it is incorrect, but it has predictive capability in reproducible environments

2019-03-05 22:36:57 UTC  

The numbers check out

2019-03-05 22:37:25 UTC  

And the more things we can get to check out, the more we can verify new ideas against

2019-03-05 22:37:42 UTC  

the numbers DO check out, but to oversimplify things, you can model 2 ( operation) 2 = 4 as 2+2=4, but you ALSO can model 2*2=4

2019-03-05 22:38:07 UTC  

there are alternative explainations for some things, but it would disrupt a lot of theories.

2019-03-05 22:38:33 UTC  

Sure, but that's not the same as everything being upended. It's partially correct, not fully incorrect

2019-03-05 22:38:36 UTC  

the reason why some theories struggle to usurp others is because they don't have a full answer for some things, but they might actually be right.

2019-03-05 22:38:43 UTC  

And we have had things like that occur in multiple fields

2019-03-05 22:38:58 UTC  

harder sciences deal with it better because they're closer to math.

2019-03-05 22:39:04 UTC  

it's like that in physics

2019-03-05 22:39:10 UTC  

softer sciences FAIL MISERABLY at this.

2019-03-05 22:39:29 UTC  

they're trying to get a "theory of everything"

2019-03-05 22:43:39 UTC  

one thing I can say for the radical left is thankfully they're removing themselves from the gene pool, maybe there's hope in the long term

2019-03-05 22:58:25 UTC  

The issue with the softer sciences is that there often too broad

2019-03-05 22:58:53 UTC  

Psych for instance is everything from neuropsych, which is dipping heavily into biology, to Jung

2019-03-05 23:50:55 UTC  

I love the natural science circle jerks

2019-03-06 01:01:22 UTC  

anyone using gab's dissenter?

2019-03-06 01:02:24 UTC  

Yassss

2019-03-06 01:02:35 UTC  

I've looked at two articles

2019-03-06 01:02:46 UTC  

It doesn't work in private mode though

2019-03-06 01:02:49 UTC  

😦

2019-03-06 01:02:53 UTC  

😢

2019-03-06 01:02:57 UTC  

:"(

2019-03-06 01:04:14 UTC  

I'm trying to figure out how to see all the comments

2019-03-06 01:04:33 UTC  

Click the icon

2019-03-06 01:05:44 UTC  

I'm not using the extension, I have the page loaded.

2019-03-06 01:06:06 UTC  

It shows like 30 comments for the latest/controversial/top but thats t

2019-03-06 01:06:35 UTC  

I thought you needed the extension for the comments

2019-03-06 01:07:01 UTC  

No you just need to log in with your gab account

2019-03-06 01:07:02 UTC  
2019-03-06 01:07:37 UTC  

You write an url there and it takes you to its comments

2019-03-06 23:29:53 UTC  

Role coll

2019-03-06 23:39:39 UTC  

oh yeah call in show is in a couple hours

2019-03-07 01:34:28 UTC  

Can anyone hit stream.me?

2019-03-07 01:45:56 UTC  

hit?

2019-03-07 01:47:56 UTC  

connect, it keeps timing out for me

2019-03-07 02:00:18 UTC  

am I in the server?