Oh, then lefties will definitely say yes, because there's those evil nazi racist bigots :^)

That’s a fascinating answer

I’d even say that breaks the question

Good counterpoint

Anyway the natural rightwing answer is that some people are observably better than others

Whether it’s nature or environment, or other circumstances, that some people are better than others

Ana with the save https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evh3wvVQuI8

Can’t see the vid, low BW on LTE

Is that the I’M BETTER THAN YOU rant?

RIP

yes

touche

the legend

But i think when Lefties talk about being better than someone, the only circumstance they use that os when they perceive someone else thinks they are superior in some way or that some people, even not them individually, are better, and that is the one cardinal sin of egalitarianism

So only in that circumstance do lefties think one person is better than another, inherently. When a person is not egalitarian, that is what makes them bad

There’s always at least one paradox in any set of logic and I think this is the paradox of Malice’s definition of left/right

I just prefer to not use left/right out of shitposting and have been slowly training myself to stop

But I have a nasty but not uncommon habit of picking up lingo from social circles

fair

Altho if enough people don’t combat say MSM’s misuse of it, the political current will continue to flow towards their ends

Because they will continue to use it when you’re not

Everything that is not collectivist and SJ will get the label Right Wing, and Right Wing is synonymous with Evil

Depends on what you mean by combat. I think undermining the validity of the discussion works. That's what I'd do for idpol

That’s a way

Lol.

That video

Left/right is just a battle to see who is more liberal. Js

No one is more Liberal then me! I want so much freedom so that we kill all the babies of the world!

@RoadtoDawn Maybe if you equate "right wing" with "Establishment Republican," you could be correct, but the Republican party does not represent the entirety of right-wing philosophy.

If you watch youtube channels The Distributist or Endeavour, you will see sects of right-wing thought that the Mainstream never gets exposure to, they are outside the Overton Window but not salacious enough to be pariahs like Richard Spencer followers.

They are the farthest thing from the media Democrat Party/Establishment Republican/Establishment Libertarian scramble to claim who is "most liberal"

These guys are staunch traditionalists. Distributist is an old-styled Catholic (maybe that's called Pre-Vatican II?), opposes the current pope and progressive Catholicism. Endeavour is a right-wing Canadian and I get the impression he is a Monarchist

Distributist is pretty cool, always liked him

If Endeavour gives monarchist vibes, I have to check them out immediately lol

And yeah I think he is sedevacantist

Endeavour's discussion of Left/Right:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJk5fh_g6A0

Endeavour & critique of Enlightenment values:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHuL45NzNTk

Conceptually *and* practically, he is on point.

This guy seems pretty based lol

The second one is too long for me to watch now but I saved it

that first video is immediately contradictory. It references two European philosophies and then insists one of them has a historical basis when both of them are the result of one of many branches in a conversation that has been going on for thousands of years