What the hell is STANAG anyway?

His argument to me about it was that seat belts save lives, so we require them, and guns save lives, so we should require them as well.

Yes I agree negative rights are the model to use in nearly every circumstance.

Oh I forgot this gem:

"Section 5 Long Arm
Any firearm with a stock or intended to be fired from the shoulder, for which the barrel shall be 18 inches in length or greater and overall length of 16 inches or greater.
Section 6 Shotgun
Any smooth-bore firearm intended to discharge a number of smaller projectiles, for which the barrel shall be 18 inches in length or greater and overall length of 16 inches or greater."

How is the overall length of a firearm supposed to be *2 inches shorter than the barrel?*

Ew.

Short barrel CQB for life.

Hahahaha

Are these DMs he sent you?

"Arming the people" doesn't mean forcing every poxy whore and limping gaffer to go around strapped 24/7...

Can someone link me a good video that covers the Jussie smollet crap?

@Salacious Swanky Cat I'd be remiss not to recommend our very own Matt's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0L_HuBpSGU

Lol. Yeah. Duh.

I’m too tired to think properly

Really, and ¿wear does it say *"shall carry STANAG 4172/4279 draft prop at all times"*?

Either way @Legalize, I already know you read into it what you ***WANTED*** to, you may as well have not *bothered,* though God damn it that length thing got brought up ***¡A YEAR AGO!*** I forgot to fix it. 👿👿👿👿
Now, as to the rather BRAZEN red herring of forced speech, let us burn that bridge when we get there, ***BUT*** the Athenian lawmaker Solon made it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. (Enforcement may have been a bit lax...)

**°°° MandatoryCarry is always typing...**

It's funny how I am completely against this law *even though I think I am already voluntarily compliant with its every provision*.

Oh wait no my rifle is currently at my workplace, not my house.

Almost compliant.

Ok. Propose a mandatory speech law and I can look at it.
You, uh, *might* have a model to work from.

@uncephalized,
Close enough.

I can't answer principle, and here's the trap snapping shut, because *you can what if this to death.*
*¿What if a bus load of nuns in the Andes all armed with AK-47's except the pregnant one, she has an RPG get stopped by unarmed terrorists looking to sneak into the US because they know how to make thier own weapo..."*

No, he's asking you a very simple question about whether you think it is the government's place to compel the exercise of rights.

You are *dodging*

...
But on principle, I think maybe police should not be allowed to ask you to waive your rights.

Now, I'm not playing your "what if" game. You wanna change the subject, go ahead; I'm not arguing about enforced speech.
You have a question about THIS issue, I can answer it, like the "16 inch" thing (doh).
But hey, you wanna talk about seperate subjects, ¿where did you get your medical and engineering degrees?

https://i.imgur.com/r19q9jQ.png

*oof*

https://i.imgur.com/r19q9jQ.png

You're deflecting.
You know there's nothing in...
Nope. You're done.

Noor

Nope

!mandatory

https://i.imgur.com/r19q9jQ.png

!mandatory

Why didn't that work

It's because Legalize doesn't like wahmen.

What a bigot

Lol

Lol

I hear excuses!

@yuma_8 only bigots call people bigots...... bigot

@Saint So are you now...bigot

This was well established long ago.