Math be rayssissss

there's an original insult @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

do you use a dartboard or a random generator?

I was never great at algebra but jeebus

Beto dropped out

If you find people's analysis of you cliche, maybe you should stop being such a cliche.

people's?

>projecting this hard

@Beemann That's ironic.

I'll give you time to point to an example

Of you being a walking, talking stereotype?

Your retard tier armchair psychology, for starters.

>if you point out my clear projection, you're a stereotype XD

Only big brain takes here

>doubling down on my stereotypical misuse of a medical term doesn't show I'm a stereotype

>tfw all your insults come from /pol/ because everyone has to fit in a neat little box for ease of dismissal

>misuse
No, I think you'll find I've followed the definition

Actually I find you did the exact opposite.

You can assert that, but it's not the case. It's probably because you think you're more unique than you actually are, my dude

You misused it in the exact way one would expect from a stereotypical shitlib hipster.

Again... the irony.

I've not started insulting people based on how cliche I find them to be

That was your call, lad

Lol. That was actually Spader. You should probably learn to read.

Spader critiqued specific behaviour. You chose to expand it to Spader in general. Understanding subjects is part of literacy

Go on, keep digging

>that thing I said happened didn't , but it's not a lie because waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

Lol.

>I dont know the difference between criticizing what someone just did and criticizing a person as a whole
I think Spader may have been spot on before lol

Bros

You should all lift instead of fight

It will bond us

Unless you're Jewish

I need to do more cardio tbh, or I'm fucked when I go back to HEMA. Lifting will help other shit though

i cant be friends with someone who cant be ~~honest~~ gay enough to insult my mom

Yeah... probably because you're not a complete sperg.

so I'm a sperg now

lol

@Beemann Lol. If you're entire argument rests on saying the thing that didn't happen did... you must really be winning.

I appreciate you again proving my point so clearly.

The thing that didn't happen did? Isn't that your position my dude? You're asserting that I'm saying the thing that did happen didn't, when I've explained why that's not the case. I've been pretty specific, and clarified further when asked, instead of flailing around in text form