Message from @KingLegion
Discord ID: 666910095136784396
that's what I'm afraid of with the boy transitioning into girl case
where the mom is a pediatrician
he chose to be a boy now but....
she won't stop
lol
people on her behalf now who see the world the way she does won't stop
eventually, we'll end up like Canada
if you want to take your kid to therapy before committing to transitioning them, you could get your kid taken away by the state
@Myth quick little thing use the video with the clips.
not just the audio
Canada does all this with the genuine intent that they are promising people their utmost freedom of choice and i do not believe there is malice behind it. Too much freedom. But not enough sense.
But what do i know, just a leaf.
I cant say with sincerity that it is purely pandering or a type of munchausen. It might just be my girl brain but the mom might just be misinformed of what true “trans” kids are -Leaving aside the debate whether people are trans or not-.
I do think canadian government and media needs to stfu or we will end up with Jessica Yaniv. Who talks like my mother. Exact same politics.
I respectfully think their freedom of choice attitude towards this, then, which I seriously doubt it could be that sentiment in this kind of ruling, is inherently blocking the freedom for parents to choose how to shape their children's beliefs and moral values. But that's just me. Definitely agree with your last point tho
But that’s exactly why i dont think there is malice but rather it all comes down to that over saturation of “be yourself” existing in every piece of media for an entire generation. Everyone is a winner, be true yo yourself, love yourself fuck the man you do you kinda shit. Lack of any understanding of the importance to listening to authority or listening to a higherpower ie god -not thati myself am god fearing-
Not sure if that kind fleshes out what im saying
They dont think the parents have the authority because parents will not allow the children to be themselves~~~*****
Can anyone tell me what the song was at the end of the most recent call-in show?
Or where I can find out? I didn't see anything on the website. Thanks!!
@Fondboy bruh you dead?
Thought this was interesting too https://i.redd.it/gtwwmae27oa41.png
you too man
Sup
Getting on train can’t voip @Catboi
It takes thousands of papers to arrive at the approximation of truth
To the cuck who got triggered yesterday, because @Legalize started talking about pens
You the real libertarian
@Zoey I think a lot of trans men are autistic enough they are uncomfortable with their body (and who isnt during puberty?), get the message women>men, and are socially disconnected enough they make the logical choice to change because they're not socially grounded enough to see the long term negatives.
Throw in some early life abuse.
And we got a stew going.
Damit can't find out about this phase I trade deal with China till about noon est
stop talking Trump sign the deal so we can read what is in this deal...
Lol no one got triggered except Legalize.
I called rights negative and him and his buttbuddy got angry lol
Which was kinda weird considering I didn't insult anyone, plus someone else joined the chat and said that rights are negative so then I got a lecture on how it was stupid.
Basically, lots of projection apparently
Apparently, I also record conversations? It was a weird argument
> I called rights negative and him and his buttbuddy got angry lol
@IDontHaveAIDSBro
in the sense of being a bad thing or to differentiate between the classes of rights?
All I said was that it was negative in a response to viv yelling at matt with a poorly constructed syllogism. Then I got accused of recording convos, never got an explanation of why it's a positive right and then on my 2nd drink I jist rolled with it lol
That 2nd amendment was a negative right and got called an idiot for an widely held opinion about the 2nd amendment, had to kinda tuck and run at that point. It was pretty entertaining though
A*
i see, so negative rights (duty of noninterference) vs positive rights (obligation to act)
Basically