@spacepan
I dunno... believing in something you think exists despite all evidence makes you seem pretty womanlike...

@spacepan
You haven't made any, tard.

Then why are you so upset?

LOL spader thinks people don't drive drunk or use heroin because gubmint

I think the rules are good, yeah

it's the right and proper role of government to repress evil

Rules exist outside government

And you know this

yeah, which rules?

Literally any rules you can conceive of

lol

This isn't hard

all I have to do is say "your rules are dumb I won't follow them"\

Do you think a law can be unjust?

sure

Ok. So cut out the middleman

Are we having a boring conversation about not stretching foreskin now?

smh

Anything is just an appeal to force or authority

what rules are there, universally agreed to?

Apparently, Dark Wall, I made no argument regarding that topic

According to Kevin

No rules are universally agreed to

exactly

No, your position is based on that

so when someone does something awful to someone else, what exactly are we to do?

I am merely stating the obvious

tell them it violates the nap?

Use dispute resolution organizations, make the case for retaliatory force after the fact

lmao

Clearly superior to the status quo

>Use dispute resolution organizations,
Like the state?

Your lack of imagination isn't a justification

The status quo is anarcho tyranny because of faggots like you.

There is a lot of subjectivism here. If somebody does something shitty to somebody like stands them up for a date, then we shouldn't do anything. But obviously we have laws in place for actual violation of people's rights.

Disputes can be resolved without terrorist monopolies

Depends what you define as awful

@spacepan depends on the dispute

many cannot

All of these questions have already been addressed

Just like the government's role being to stop evil being incredibly subjective, which I think is exemplified via the modern social justice hysteria landscape that sees everything as evil.