Message from @•Luke•

Discord ID: 628045224022638593


2019-09-30 01:27:22 UTC  

set this as the server pfp for now

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/628013859776626711/628040159908200459/33rnly.png

2019-09-30 01:28:39 UTC  

I don't see how there can be proposition s that are neither based or cringe

2019-09-30 01:29:23 UTC  

they simply fail to be cringe

2019-09-30 01:29:27 UTC  

yet are not based

2019-09-30 01:33:17 UTC  

(1) "Material composition", or commitment to materialism.
(2) "Non-reductionism", or the view that mental properties cannot be reduced to physical properties.
(3) "Realism" about mental properties.
(4) "Non-emergence", or the view that "there are no truly emergent properties of complex systems".

2019-09-30 01:38:40 UTC  

I listened for the last 15mins while having breakfast and I have no idea what you people are talking about

2019-09-30 01:39:02 UTC  

Seems like we're talking about logic

2019-09-30 01:39:09 UTC  

metaphysics

2019-09-30 01:39:48 UTC  

ok i guess i dont know either 😂

2019-09-30 01:44:33 UTC  

just read the pictures

2019-09-30 01:44:46 UTC  

not the entire thing

2019-09-30 01:45:59 UTC  

@Deleted User he says that truth is a folk psychology term so self refuting arguments dont

2019-09-30 01:46:01 UTC  

work

2019-09-30 01:46:29 UTC  

lmfao

2019-09-30 01:47:14 UTC  

2019-09-30 01:47:25 UTC  

Thanks for using Fredboat Music! To get started, join a voice channel and type `;;play <song name>`. I'll give you a list of 5 songs where you can choose one by typing `;;play <number>`.

Type `;;commands` for a list of commands you can use! Or go to <https://fredboat.com/docs> for a full review of what I can do. Type `;;help` for documentation, bot invite links, and an invite to the Fredboat Hangout Discord Server.

You can set up FredBoat to announce music as it plays and automatically resume when a user enters the channel with the `;;config` command.

I can speak your language, too! Type `;;language` to see a list of languages I can speak. It should look like this: `;;language en_US` but with your language code.

I have a built in permissions system you can use! Follow this link to learn more: <https://fredboat.com/docs/permissions>

2019-09-30 01:47:26 UTC  

;;play boibortion

2019-09-30 01:47:26 UTC  

Song **#1** has been selected: **boibortion.mp4** (00:42)

2019-09-30 01:47:29 UTC  

;;1

2019-09-30 01:49:33 UTC  

;;play uh oh stinky

2019-09-30 01:49:34 UTC  

Song **#1** has been selected: **UH OH** (01:00)

2019-09-30 01:49:36 UTC  

;;1

2019-09-30 01:50:33 UTC  

;;stop

2019-09-30 01:50:33 UTC  

The queue has been emptied, `1` track has been removed.

2019-09-30 01:56:07 UTC  

2019-09-30 01:57:05 UTC  

ye

2019-09-30 01:57:41 UTC  

2019-09-30 01:59:08 UTC  

Property dualism cringe

2019-09-30 01:59:36 UTC  

He is a deflationist about metaphysical language as well

2019-09-30 02:01:21 UTC  

where are the egirls

2019-09-30 02:01:27 UTC  

we need egirls in this server

2019-09-30 02:03:57 UTC  

@Deleted User you should ask phillip he had a defeater irrc

2019-09-30 02:07:16 UTC  

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Diego_Machuca/publication/280972889_Suspension_Equipollence_and_Inquiry_A_Reply_to_Wieland/links/5bc8eb1ca6fdcc03c7909ae0/Suspension-Equipollence-and-Inquiry-A-Reply-to-Wieland.pdf '' Pyrrhonian suspension of judgment does not rest on a commitment to some rational principle or norm. Some interpreters have indeed claimed that the Pyrrhonist’s suspension is the result of the adherence to a norm according to which one is rationally required to suspend judgment about whether p if it appears to one that there is no reason to either believe or disbelieve p (see esp. Perin 2010: ch. 2). But in line with most interpreters, I think that suspension should rather be construed as the result of a psychological constraint: suspension is the involuntary psychological effect of being confronted with arguments that strike one as equally persuasive. Given that the Pyrrhonist is a thinking being (PH I 24) who is hardwired to respond in specific ways, he is affected by the consideration of arguments pro and con p and automatically reacts in a given way, even though he refrains from making assertions about both whether those arguments are sound and whether they are objectively equipollent (see Machuca 2011b: sect. 5; 2013: sect. 4).''

2019-09-30 02:07:57 UTC  
2019-09-30 02:11:33 UTC  

2019-09-30 02:24:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/628013859776626711/628054629871255553/avatars-000597831615-6q438f-t500x500.png