@Deleted User to assert a statement is just to assert that it is true basically truth doesn't have a nature beyond ordinary claims it would reject both realism and antirealism about truth

@Castore boghossion has an argument agianst that

@Deleted User isn't ethical naturalism compatible with physicalism?

boghossian

yeah but ethical naturlaism fails

boghossion will burn in hell

why

because he has not accepted the great religion of islam

@Windle not peter boghossian

wait, who?

peter is who i thought C2 was talking about

paul boghossian

@Windle they are talking about an epistemic relativist philosopher

ah, okay. thank you

https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/138325/papq00404.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

@Castore <

Transcendental materialism

Thanks,will @Deleted User take a look but his objection prolly has been addressed in the literature by now.

P->Q

p->im hard

~P->~Q

P implies that im hard

~Q->~P

W and P implies im hard

W /\ P -> H

woman and penis implies hard

woman and penis is truew

therefore im hard

you need ESP

lol

also behavior entails qualia lol

although you seem to be using behavior synbomomsly with action

hi guys

and not guys

@Wix hey

hi nick ❤

@Deleted User can i get a methodes bitch rank?

JK