That was embarrassing

Also Violence of some kind would be required otherwise it would be the government peacefully handing over power which would not be considered a coup.

@Reclan So in this instance it would be definitionally wrong.

i think thats naive

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/coup?q=coup

It requires illegality, and again as far as I'm aware violence is inherently required.

I mean on the Illegality aspect alone Bolivia would not be a coup since it was legal.

So wiki is using a weird defintion of "the overthrow of an existing government by non-democratic means"

Which would still not make the bolivian transition as a Coup as the existing government has not been removed, with the president stepping down you could argue that it is "Undemocratic" but again the government itself was not overthrown.

Using this definition and calling it a "coup" would imply anytime a democratic leader steps down it is a "Coup" for being undemocratic.

https://skribbl.io/?7OkNZ2GcbE

who wants to play?

@AusFox @Hagar @Marcdoof

hold on

@Deleting User What want small kid

let me get a drink

soy latte?

@Deleting User yeah soon

alright

https://skribbl.io/?dWE2G8o8P3

<a:eyesflip:450764252127428638>

@muhahahahe

@muhahahahe

@muhahahahe

what the fuck

i got weeb nazi shit

the only weeb shit i got

lol

@Mou post pics of the Italian guy

The German is ugly

is that germany from hetalia?

Italy from hetalia? @Deleted User

Yes

Silly goose

On it

@Deleted User ??