Message from @LustrousMandrill
Discord ID: 647983328913391626
'Cuck' is just a spicier version of 'coward' in internet discourse.
🤱
South Park had the same arc from countercultural to mainstream that The Simpsons had
"Trump shit all over himself on live TV. I consider it brilliance, I guess you consider it stupidity.*
The perfect world for a Conservative is just climbing into the Absolute Safety Capsule from Mother 3
Tatsumaki has good taste in media
Lol
Fuck the JQ, have y'all heard of the IQ
Gallagher
You've never heard of the WQ
Can I actually ask something?
If one were to believe the drunken, Australian ramblings of modern neo-nazis, why wouldn't one want to side with the alleged cabal of hyper-competent masterminds?
As far as I can tell, the smart move is to just go with the flow. It's not like the proposed 'white' side of the aisle has done... like, anything.
oh shit
Oh god
Oh **fuck**
IT'S THE IRISH?!
Bush wasnt a WASP?
hmmmmm
You're telling me WASPs are Irish too?!
HOLY FUCK
`The anti‐Semite has chosen hate because hate is a faith; at the outset he has chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease he feels as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions about the rights of the Jew appear to him. He has placed himself on other ground from the beginning. If out of courtesy he consents for a moment to defend his point of view, he lends himself but does not give himself. He tries simply to project his intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse. I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti‐Semites, all of them absurd: “I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc.”`
`Never believe that anti‐Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly since he believes in words. The anti‐Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument has passed.`
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.
@نشيد hey that's from Squire's Trial isn't it
This insight into his mind is intriguing