Message from @Summer~ 🍃
Discord ID: 653732800025067523
That's a general inference
Identify of indiscernibles ?
This is just sense/reference
Who is being spoken of?
Female noise troll in Tom's server... I assume Godless but
You turds should learn about attention economy and why you guys enjoy having the dopamine drip memers that give you the outrage
EVERYONE SPEAK QUICKLY
Oh no...
Why are dumpsters so against verificationism? ... because you can't verify the verification principle? 😴
This meme needs to die
There are circles at foundations..
is he like working out. Is this Der Einzige
I have to work out while I talk
It's be an endless shitshow of justification
You're just asking reductio of "I believe I believe"
I believe I have beliefs 😴
I don't believe methode when he says he doesn't believe in laws but ok
Physicalist = phenom is physical so you haven't escaped
I'm gonna need a definition of philosophy that escapes tautology
The same tautology that science suffers from
Morons that don't read smdh
Typing is more permanent, and you can see edits
voice conversation, most people are tabbed out
IE: Harder to equivocate
Or at the very least, you can see that equivocation is happening, much easier...
Not that I care about equivocation
Because language is literally that
Word for this
X for that
i dunno why you are trying to debate this dude i am just saying that no one is going to read what you are typing here so its best for you to wait until you can talk
If you dispense of equivocation, you've dispensed of equivalences of object to symbol
You're reading it <:Smug:643129431434461194>
Rationality is investigating your internal world of memories / stored sense data
im glancing at best
I don't know if you guys like IdeasInhat, he's kind of a douche but
https://ideasinhat.com/2019/01/01/the-difference-between-philosophy-and-science/
This meme is basically what I agree with, it's a labeling error to distinguish the two
Linguistics are all trivial
I'm not a metaphysical or ontological trivialist though
That's ... too far
Liars Paradox
Modal realism
Characterization principle
And Via PSR
The LEM is merely a principle so it's neither true nor false