Message from @Summer~ 🍃
Discord ID: 653732910012301313
You turds should learn about attention economy and why you guys enjoy having the dopamine drip memers that give you the outrage
EVERYONE SPEAK QUICKLY
Oh no...
Why are dumpsters so against verificationism? ... because you can't verify the verification principle? 😴
This meme needs to die
There are circles at foundations..
is he like working out. Is this Der Einzige
I have to work out while I talk
It's be an endless shitshow of justification
You're just asking reductio of "I believe I believe"
I believe I have beliefs 😴
I don't believe methode when he says he doesn't believe in laws but ok
Physicalist = phenom is physical so you haven't escaped
no one reads this dude dont bother typing here
I'm gonna need a definition of philosophy that escapes tautology
The same tautology that science suffers from
Morons that don't read smdh
Typing is more permanent, and you can see edits
IE: Harder to equivocate
Or at the very least, you can see that equivocation is happening, much easier...
Not that I care about equivocation
Because language is literally that
Word for this
X for that
i dunno why you are trying to debate this dude i am just saying that no one is going to read what you are typing here so its best for you to wait until you can talk
If you dispense of equivocation, you've dispensed of equivalences of object to symbol
You're reading it <:Smug:643129431434461194>
Rationality is investigating your internal world of memories / stored sense data
im glancing at best
I don't know if you guys like IdeasInhat, he's kind of a douche but
https://ideasinhat.com/2019/01/01/the-difference-between-philosophy-and-science/
This meme is basically what I agree with, it's a labeling error to distinguish the two
Linguistics are all trivial
I'm not a metaphysical or ontological trivialist though
That's ... too far
Liars Paradox
Modal realism
Characterization principle
And Via PSR
The LEM is merely a principle so it's neither true nor false
Everytime you use a deduction, you're also using the principle or Law of excluded middle
You're using Bayesian logic
All lemons are yellow (with a truth value of .99, false value of 01) <----- both true and false
If the laws themselves are not true, then you ought not even believe the laws of logic