Message from @Summer~ šŸƒ

Discord ID: 654466988176834580


2019-12-11 22:25:59 UTC  

I'm assuming you mean companions in guilt = COG? Why is it an O?

2019-12-11 22:30:33 UTC  

```One might object that any formulation of physicalism which utilizes the theory-based conception will be either trivial or false.``` HELL YEA.... Jumping on board that trivialist boat

2019-12-11 22:34:13 UTC  

@Deleted User The belief that math reduces into prop logic is logicism

2019-12-11 22:35:37 UTC  

``` Both versions of logicismā€”strong and weakā€”maintain that

All the objects forming the subject matter of those branches of mathematics are logical objects; and
Logicā€”in some suitably general and powerful sense that the logicist will have to defineā€”is capable of furnishing definitions of the primitive concepts of these branches of mathematics, allowing one to derive the mathematicianā€™s ā€˜first principlesā€™ therein as results within Logic itself. (The branch of mathematics in question is thereby said to have been reduced to Logic.)
```

2019-12-11 22:37:06 UTC  

Yikes, I don't think I've read all this because it has the zero meme in it

2019-12-11 22:37:08 UTC  

And it would have been great

2019-12-11 22:37:27 UTC  

``` These two forms of neo-Fregean revival of logicism share the following three important features with Fregeā€™s own treatment.

First, the number 0 (zero) is still defined as the number of any empty concept: in particular, as the number of non-self-identical things (formally: #x Ā¬x = x).

Secondly, once the existence of any natural number n is secured, that of its successor, s(n), is secured by taking s(n) to be the number of all natural numbers from 0 to n, inclusive (Fregeā€™s trick).

Thirdly, the definition of the concept of natural number exploits the notion of the ancestral of the relation of succession: x bears the succession-ancestral relation to y just in case y is at most finitely many steps of succession away from x. (As already made clear, any apparent circularity in this definition, deriving from the adverbial gloss ā€˜finitelyā€™, turns out, upon closer inspection of the definitions used, to be just that: merely apparent.) The concept ā€œz is a natural numberā€ is then defined as ā€œeither 0 is z, or 0 bears the succession-ancestral relation to zā€. And this is what allows the neo-Fregean logicist to derive the principle of mathematical induction for the natural numbers. The reader of this survey article will be spared the formal details. ```

2019-12-11 22:38:18 UTC  

Oh god... there's a lot of jargon in that

2019-12-11 22:57:51 UTC  

@Castore ```[5:12 PM] Castore: @actual_communist_boi he amends the objections in the paper he isnt making the same objection iirc he says that in the next paragraphs.```

2019-12-11 22:57:59 UTC  

I know that the first three objections just made me mad

2019-12-11 22:58:02 UTC  

dumb af

2019-12-11 23:05:13 UTC  

@Deleted User what did you just say

2019-12-11 23:05:23 UTC  

@Deleted User since you are low IQ, on average, I expect that you misinterpreted it

2019-12-11 23:11:11 UTC  

I can prove that this is not true deductively:

P1. To be fair, it takes a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty
P2. Methode watches and understands Rick and Morty

Conclusion - By conjunction of P1 and P2, methode has a very high IQ

2019-12-11 23:13:52 UTC  

That's an airtight argument if I've ever seen one

2019-12-11 23:19:02 UTC  

I missed out on one part. Were they saying that I'm lawful evil?

2019-12-11 23:19:34 UTC  

Castle docterine is really cool

2019-12-11 23:19:50 UTC  

I wish I lived in Colorado again because of it

2019-12-11 23:21:39 UTC  

@Sasha if you can get them to join the infantry and you join the infantry and you end up in the same squads maybe they die in a friendly fire accident (in CoD ofc). Just saying

2019-12-11 23:38:09 UTC  

@Deleted User anytime a women enters voice

2019-12-11 23:42:13 UTC  

can we getta squadhands in the chat

2019-12-12 00:23:48 UTC  

@Dodger101 you are dumb

2019-12-12 00:23:57 UTC  

@Deleted User also what is your race realism shit

2019-12-12 00:23:57 UTC  

@Deleted User also what is your race realism shit

2019-12-12 00:23:58 UTC  

@Deleted User also what is your race realism shit

2019-12-12 00:23:58 UTC  

@Deleted User also what is your race realism shit

2019-12-12 00:24:03 UTC  

tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk

2019-12-12 00:24:04 UTC  

tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk tell me what to debunk

2019-12-12 00:24:04 UTC  

tell me what to debunk

2019-12-12 00:24:19 UTC  

@Deleted User make it so commie boi cant tag me please

2019-12-12 00:24:23 UTC  
2019-12-12 00:24:32 UTC  

lol

2019-12-12 00:24:36 UTC  

@Dodger101 you think he's competent?

2019-12-12 00:24:36 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/628013859776626711/654478679476273192/unknown.png

2019-12-12 00:25:10 UTC  

i will destroy you <:GODSTINY:399640605053026314>

2019-12-12 00:26:25 UTC  

@Dodger101 sis we should do a podcast together

2019-12-12 00:26:27 UTC  

that's such easy content

2019-12-12 00:27:26 UTC  

@Dodger101 my dream podcast team is like, dodger (dumb ML takes but angry and funny) + bentham/bad_stats (semidumb socdem takes but angry and funny) + some actually funny libertarian socialist

2019-12-12 00:30:10 UTC  

starting a podcast together is the 21st century version of starting a band together