Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 656719117801488394
which one
yes, the number is low because it doesnt happen
out of 54,000 total incidents
the incidents are total incidents
daily reminder they are overrepresented in STDs
the percived offender is based on a small sample
wH*te women also have less T
yes because it doesnt happen
thats why there isnt a large sample
no
the sample sizes for percieved offender were small
idiot
so wH*te men are underrepresented?
Here's what Cohen has to say about this:
I can’t believe we’re talking about this. The most important bottom line is that the BJS should not report extrapolations to the whole population from samples this small. These population numbers should not be on this table. At best these numbers are estimated with very large standard errors. (Using a standard confident interval calculator, that 16% of White women, based on a sample of 69, yields a confidence interval of +/- 9%.) It’s irresponsible, and it’s inadvertently (I assume) feeding White supremacist propaganda.
no the samples about perception of offender are small
within 9% is pretty sharp
why is it that americans of color are overrepresented in STD stats
Now, go back to the structure of the survey. If each respondent in the survey counts for about 1,700 people, then the survey in 2008 would have found 69 White women who were sexually assaulted or threatened, 11 of whom said their assailant was Black (117,640/1,700). Actually, though, we know it was less than 11, because the asterisk on the table takes you to the footnote below which says it was based on 10 or fewer sample cases. In comparison, the survey may have found 27 Black women who said they were sexually assaulted or threatened (46,580/1,700), none of whom said their attacker was White, which is why the second blue box shows 0.0. However, it actually looks like the weights are bigger for Black women, because the figure for the percentage assaulted or threatened by Black attackers, 74.8%, has the asterisk that indicates 10 or fewer cases. If there were 27 Black women in this category, then 74.8% of them would be 20. So this whole Black women victim sample might be as little as 13, with bigger weights applied (because, say, Black women had a lower response rate). If in fact Black women are just as likely to be attacked or assaulted by White men as the reverse, 16%, you might only expect 2 of those 13 to be White, and so finding a sample 0 is not very surprising. The actual weighting scheme is clearly much more complicated, and I don’t know the unweighted counts, as they are not reported here (and I didn’t analyze the individual-level data).
oh my god
i deny your claim that the government is racist
good bye
nowhere has that claim been made
the claim is youre an idiot
your*
repeating dead memes
Amazin
your is posseive
you idiot
cringe
youre is you are
bro this is cring
you fucking moron
stop posting cringe
you are an idiot vs your an idiot
your*
lol
youre pretending to be stupid now