Message from @A Rat
Discord ID: 658145086630133767
You have the she/her/hers role Dana
the good morning . good nigth
Oh yeah
I feel I should have he him role but at the same time i want the fem one...
Sadders
If she/her pronouns make you happier, then just use she/her pronouns. It's pretty simple
Your true friends will respect it
Speaking for myself, I can at least assure you that I will appreciate you regardless of how you identify or what pronouns you use π
You should be honest and use she/her
.s
@σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ Tylerπ₯ were you in politics 101?
@LustrousMandrill @Deleted User unmute me please
Goodnyaght everynyan! i hope you are all willing to die for monarch. almost another year has passed and im still depressed and hate my fat self. keep imaging things ill never do and haven't done. i feel like i devote a lot of energy to coping with doing so little (as weird and pathetic as that sounds). i make mistakes and suffer for them.
Yo @Hagar are you able to get in VC real quick
<:hmm:630214786172452906>
__**Claim:** *wage change due to us immigration is either near zero or slightly positive*__
*Immigration (Economy)
Employment + Wages*
a consensus study by the National Academies finds that immigration to the US increases economic growth and doesn't reduce wages: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23550/the-economic-and-fiscal-consequences-of-immigration
a meta-analysis of several immigration studies finds almost no effect on native wages or native employment: https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/2853421 *We find small wage and employment impacts, even smaller than have been detected in previous metaanalytic research. A 1% point increase in the share of immigrants in a local labour market of the typical host country decreases wages of the native born by 0.029% (using a weighted average with weights determined by the precision of the estimates) and decreases employment of the native born by 0.011%.*
Immigration to the US slightly increases wages for natives, slightly decreases wages for low-education natives, and significantly decreases wages for immigrants: https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article/10/1/152/2182016 In the long run, these estimates imply an overall average positive effect of immigration on native wages of about 0.6% and an overall average negative effect on the wages of previous immigrants of about 6%. [....] All in all, one finding seems robust: once imperfect substitutability between natives and immigrants is allowed for, over the period 1990 2006 immigration to the United States had at most a modest negative long-run effect on the real wages of the least educated natives. This effect is between 2.1% and +1.7% depending on the chosen nesting structure, with the positive results coming from the nesting structure preferred by the data. Our finding at the national level of a small wage effect of immigration on less-educated natives is in line with the findings identified at the city level.
immigration is a net positive for the economy, but unequally benefits the high-skilled: https://www.economics.uci.edu/files/docs/colloqpapers/w06/Cortes.pdf The wage effects are sizeable but plausible: a 10 percent increase in the number of low-skilled immigrants in a city reduces the wages of low-skilled natives by 0.6 percent and of low-skilled immigrants by 8 percent (an own-labor demand elasticity of -1.2). My results imply that the low-skilled immigration wave of the 1990s increased the purchasing power of high-skilled workers living in the 25 largest cities by an average of 0.65 percent and decreased the purchasing power of native high school dropouts by an average of 2.66 percent. I conclude that, through lower prices, low-skilled immigration brings positive net benefits to the US economy as a whole, but generates a redistribution of wealth: it reduces the real income of low-skilled natives and increases the real income of high-skilled natives.
states with more foreign-born workers experience faster TFP (productivity) growth: https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/REST_a_00137
even immigration skeptic George Borjas admits that immigrants are net contributors: https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/gborjas/publications/popular/CIS2013.pdf https://www.vox.com/2015/8/17/9164725/immigration-and-wages-impact Of the $1.6 trillion increase in GDP, 97.8 percent goes to the immigrants themselves in the form of wages and benefits; the remainder constitutes the "immigration surplus" the benefit accruing to the native-born population, including both workers, owners of firms, and other users of the services provided by immigrants.
H1B visas increase sales, employment, and profits for US firms: https://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/~fortega/research/ghosh_mayda_ortega.pdf
@Fondboy get in here guy wants game reccomendation
CS:GO
COD MW
HALO MCC
sry