Message from @The Prodigal Toast ♒
Discord ID: 658973433551388672
However... this naturally leads to the counter argument that you're gentrifying
Which... has a bad history
Tangential meme on concentration camps though... I'd agree to basically any semantic name like calling the detainment camps of Mexicans at our border such... I just don't know what conditions it actually entails
I've heard it's shit at our Mexican border though... people starving, no food, shower, water, etc
So no basic needs met
@actual_communist_boi cummy boi, where is it cheapest to concentration camp the homeless? <:Smug:643129431434461194>
Modest Proposal up in here
...
What a frightening question
@L.A.IN Don't ever compare me to Bent
It's a pragmatic question... economists do this constantly since they need to know where comparative advantage lies
Also, it came up because people are saying cities are moving their homeless around to other cities
If you actually care about them, you, in theory, ought to find them the cheapest locals / cost of living with also available labor opportunities such they can integrate
wow forcing people to labor!
I'm not for forcing people to labor... but we're many steps removed from a welfare state of allowing people to live without laboring
That's arguably the endgoal or aspiration that people can choose not to labor, but that doesn't seem to be realistic currently
Scrambled Eggs has a few seconds to stop eating on mic
@Deleted User It's based off Hume
IE: He says deductive arguments are only demonstrative arguments
You can conceive of an immortal man
i had a dream about reading humes wikipedia paqge once
Weird
@Deleted User maybe that’s why you thought he was an emotivist
Lol @Marcdoof
Hume ... is an emotivist
The fuck?
😴
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/
```This argument about motives concludes that moral judgments or evaluations are not the products of reason alone. From this many draw the sweeping conclusion that for Hume moral evaluations are not beliefs or opinions of any kind, but lack all cognitive content. That is, they take the argument to show that Hume holds a non-propositional view of moral evaluations — and indeed, given his sentimentalism, that he is an emotivist: one who holds that moral judgments are meaningless ventings of emotion that can be neither true nor false. Such a reading should be met with caution, however. For Hume, to say that something is not a product of reason alone is not equivalent to saying it is not a truth-evaluable judgment or belief. Hume does not consider all our (propositional) beliefs and opinions to be products of reason; some arise directly from sense perception, for example, and some from sympathy. Also, perhaps there are (propositional) beliefs we acquire via probable reasoning but not by such reasoning alone. One possible example is the belief that some object is a cause of pleasure, a belief that depends upon prior impressions as well as probable reasoning.```
mango apple sauce, marshemellows, cookies
what are you doing
Love me some Gardevoir
I actually used to have cropped Gardevoir hentai as my profile picture
I had forgotten but that picture brought the memory back for me
Send me that hentai in DMs @LustrousMandrill
I doubt I have it anymore, it was on my old computer
