I mean...
How is someone supposed to say someone's socially inept

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/speech-acts/ reading about this garbo again...
Honestly, this is why I hate philosophers. Too many unnecessary distinctions... This mother fucker literally uses a chemistry analogy

``` Illocutionary force and semantic content are often taken to be distinct from one another, not just in the way that your left and right hand are distinct, but rather by virtue of falling into different categories. Stenius 1967 elucidates this distinction, noting that in chemical parlance a radical is a group of atoms normally incapable of independent existence, whereas a functional group is the grouping of those atoms in a compound that is responsible for certain of that compound's properties. Analogously, it is often remarked that a Proposition is itself communicatively inert. For instance, merely expressing the Proposition that it is snowing is not to make a move in a “language game”. Rather, such a move is only made by putting forth a Proposition with an illocutionary force such as assertion, conjecture, command, etc. The chemical analogy gains further support from the fact that just as a chemist might isolate radicals held in common among various compounds, the student of language may isolate a common element held among ‘Is the door shut?’, ‘Shut the door!’, and ‘The door is shut’. This common element is the Proposition that the door is shut, queried in the first sentence, commanded to be made true in the second, and asserted in the third. According to the chemical analogy, then:

Illocutionary force : Propositional content :: functional group : radical ```

Pointless distinction, though... if you ask me... until there's a mismatch between the speech act and the the effect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vM6pAQfaiU

@LustrousMandrill I never got a response back on my friendship application 😭

It's being processed

O

@Deleted User what am I?

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Death%20grip

Hot

Imagine not taking a tautological definition of physicalism 😴

Hempel's dilemma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Emblem_Fates

@Marcdoof

@Hagar non agent is a stolen line

@Deleted User have you been in any gangs?

<:Feelsok:643818539454562304>

@Castore I feel like this question has racist implications

@LustrousMandrill racism as in a form of oppression ,institution or racism as in individual disregard or ill will?

Little bit from column A, little bit from column B

No @Castore

This is the definition I'm working with: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
In this case, the racial characteristic in question is black people being in gangs

I'm culturally white

@LustrousMandrill it wasnt from columnb

morally unlucky

🤡 i was just joking the whole time

@Hagar Matthew 7:12

@Hagar John 13:34-35

@Hagar chad 42:0

@Marcdoof

Get in or die

@AusFox ok ok

@Marcdoof do it

@Marcdoof

ugh

i fucking hate this bitch

She’s a troll duh

HEY