Message from @actual_communist_boi
Discord ID: 664911409867522054
Hey danacrag
Hewoo
chain wants to edate you
No bulli
I don’t like these accusations
Trans people dont exist
<:breadthink:663617149805395968>
Blacks cant say the n word. They stole it from whites. It is actually our word, it is cultural appropriation
Nuclear all the way!
dana are you on hrt yet
Massive power
Hey Reese
hi
Nuclear power has been used in france for decades
# deaths per twh
2007 study: <https://ourworldindata.org/what-is-the-safest-form-of-energy> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/629016674397454360/unknown.png
2008 WHO study: <https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/629017070226374668/unknown.png
2017 study: <https://www.visualcapitalist.com/worlds-safest-source-energy/> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/629017165357645836/safest-energy-sources.png
Germans went for wind. And then they ran out of space to put windmills
its heavily subsidized and in france
Ok
claims
- cost / twh
- deaths / twh
- trust
accounting for lifetime costs, wind and solar are cheapest: <https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/renewable-energy/barriers-to-renewable-energy#.W-s1fN-YVuR> <https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2017/> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/642020024625922088/chart-1-finally.png However, if costs over the lifespan of energy projects are taken into account, wind and utility-scale solar can be the least expensive energy generating sources, according to asset management company Lazard. As of 2017, the cost (before tax credits that would further drop the costs) of wind power was $30-60 per megawatt-hour (a measure of energy), and large-scale solar cost $43-53/MWh. For comparison: energy from the most efficient type of natural gas plants cost $42-78/MWh; coal power cost at least $60/MWh.
So does wind and solar. Tons of government intervention in solar and wind
Reminder that mining for materials to make wind and solar tech is more pollutant than nuclear
in every country but the USA and Germany, nuclear power overnight construction costs per kWh stayed flat or declined -- suggesting that the multi-reactor sites and standardized designs of these countries were efficient: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516300106> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/614113743793815624/1-s2.png The metric OCC includes the costs of the direct engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services that the vendors and the architect-engineer team are contracted to provide, as well as the indirect owner’s costs, which include land, site preparation, project management, training, contingencies, and commissioning costs. The OCC excludes financing charges known as Interest During Construction.
from my reading
We shouldn't use death drugs I agree. We should use a rope or a bullet
something like 90% of the emissions growth is projected to be in the developing world
god why does this lady make so many claims
as africa and parts of asia continue to industrialize
so we cant trust the mud people to use nuclear
so solar is the way forward
@actual_communist_boi debate me
Disneyland has permission to build a nuclear plant
not from the state
from their own municipality
my position isn't that nuclear is bad, I just have concerns about feasability.
c:
which they control
so its kind of not a thing
i'm glad the convo went somewhere else tho
just a big meme