Message from @Marcdoof
Discord ID: 664934749382508563
This is the RBH fallacy
bottom text fallacy
Check it
RBH
Tbf premise 1 is weirdly phrased
yeah, the language in the syllo is confusing.
<:doobyirl:602961252075175965>
Just change it to "if some method x has achieved some aim y in the past, it is conceivable it could again"
.....
It is just an empirical question
"get destroyed"
LMAO
gotta love pogs
Are they calling the problem of induction the problem of inference?
I don’t know
But that’s a weird thing to pull
what a weaselly little liar dude @actual_communist_boi
So I’d want to say no
weaselly little liar
Pogan is winning
Rule following paradox
Then what problem of inference is this?
>nuance
Yeah rule following paradox
Duh
Gg EZ
There talking about probability, this HAS to be induction
the bloodsports begins!
@Hagar cute pfp
What a fucking LIAR, dude. What a fucking WEASELLY little, liar, dude. What a fucking, WEASELLY little LIAR, dude. Holy SHIT, dude. HOLY fucking shit, dude. Literally lying. STILL LYING to his audience.
Just clarify
What a fucking LIAR, dude. What a fucking WEASELLY little, liar, dude. What a fucking, WEASELLY little LIAR, dude. Holy SHIT, dude. HOLY fucking shit, dude. Literally lying. STILL LYING to his audience.
What a fucking LIAR, dude. What a fucking WEASELLY little, liar, dude. What a fucking, WEASELLY little LIAR, dude. Holy SHIT, dude. HOLY fucking shit, dude. Literally lying. STILL LYING to his audience. @actual_communist_boi
What a fucking LIAR, dude. What a fucking WEASELLY little, liar, dude. What a fucking, WEASELLY little LIAR, dude. Holy SHIT, dude. HOLY fucking shit, dude. Literally lying. STILL LYING to his audience.
What a fucking LIAR, dude. What a fucking WEASELLY little, liar, dude. What a fucking, WEASELLY little LIAR, dude. Holy SHIT, dude. HOLY fucking shit, dude. Literally lying. STILL LYING to his audience.