This would be a pretty interesting debate

Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race. Nevertheless, most mixed-race adolescents are at low risk. Most of the risk items we assessed may be interpreted as related to stress, so we may therefore choose to interpret mixed race as a source of stress. We cannot identify further the source of the stress. Subsequent research can start with the assumption of greater risk for the mixed-race-identified adolescent and try to identify the sources of stress. Only then can we recommend programmatic attention to mixed-race youths. Our comparison of mixed-race-identified adolescents on family structure, parent education, GPA, and PVT shows that on these culture-related nonrisk characteristics, mixed race youths have values in-between the constituent races, confirming a mixed-race cultural experience.

5th study

@Deleting User it isn't

They just lie and don't read

It would be fun to see you debate him though

They refused to get in vc

And text chat debates are just time wasters

Is he actually text cucking? Sad

Low energy

@Neuron Cortex sadly

Horseshoe theory Redux

Doomers are the enlightened centrists

>tfw blocked by methode for 100th time

it will be taken seriously by the lefties @bruno

you can bulli me in dm if you want tho

@bruno

Yes

Do you have a problem with it?

hewwo :3

Lmfao

@LustrousMandrill not to ban this guy ^

@actual_communist_boi

<@&644177706367451163> accounting for lifetime costs, wind and solar are cheapest: <https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/renewable-energy/barriers-to-renewable-energy#.W-s1fN-YVuR> <https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2017/> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/642020024625922088/chart-1-finally.png However, if costs over the lifespan of energy projects are taken into account, wind and utility-scale solar can be the least expensive energy generating sources, according to asset management company Lazard. As of 2017, the cost (before tax credits that would further drop the costs) of wind power was $30-60 per megawatt-hour (a measure of energy), and large-scale solar cost $43-53/MWh. For comparison: energy from the most efficient type of natural gas plants cost $42-78/MWh; coal power cost at least $60/MWh.

climate change abatement that would cost just 0.4% of global GDP (less than USD350bn of about USD87trn) could reduce yearly gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions (GtCO2e) from 70 to 38 (54%) by 2030: <https://ourworldindata.org/how-much-will-it-cost-to-mitigate-climate-change> <https://www.cbd.int/financial/doc/Pathwaystoalowcarboneconomy.pdf> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/631555533752631296/Global-Potential-Abatement.png

<@&644177706367451163> debunk this!!!

<@&644177706367451163> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgL_9jEZ6IE

@LustrousMandrill rate my meme

@goboblin debunk this ^

@goboblin debunk this ^

@goboblin debunk this ^

@goboblin debunk this ^

@goboblin it's embedded 5 minutes in, inbetween interminable statistics

you should just end the video with it

@actual_communist_boi

@Hartless Morrigan can you debunk this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgL_9jEZ6IE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wdRQW8WmVI @Hartless Morrigan