Message from @Deleting User

Discord ID: 665630114234630157


2020-01-11 17:44:49 UTC  
2020-01-11 17:45:21 UTC  

Lol leagal eagle watches hbomberguy

2020-01-11 17:53:18 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665614229683961856/IMG_20200111_115548_276.png

2020-01-11 18:11:45 UTC  

Okay larper

2020-01-11 18:22:16 UTC  

Note: I’m not a racial supremacist, I don’t believe any race is superior or inferior over the other. I’m against race mixing because I’m against racism and I respect all races/ethnicities.
I’m mixed race and I'm 100% against race mixing/interracial relationships. Because:

1. Race mixing is racism/race hatred. How is mixing races out of existence not race hatred? How is mixing races out of existence racial love/racial respect? Every person I've ever asked has been unable to answer this. Race mixing is race hatred not because of the feelings or intentions of the individuals involved, but because the very act of race mixing itself inevitably mixes races and entire racial lines out of existence.

2. Race mixing is scientifically proven to have detrimental consequences such as mixed race people having infertility, mental health issues, defects/disabilities, etc. due to being mixed.

3. Race mixing destroys diversity. If everyone mixed incessantly, we’d ultimately all be one mixed race. Bio-diversity on this planet is beautiful, why does it need to be destroyed?

2020-01-11 18:22:25 UTC  

Mixed people are more likely to have a variety of medical issues.
Sources:
- White-Asian children are twice as likely as Asians to have mental illness. http://news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=8732
- White/Black babies are less healthy than monoracial babies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
- Mixed race couples are more likely to have stillborn babies than same-race couples. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15994621
- Black-White children are more likely than both Black and Whites to make poor decisions. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14192
- Mixed race kids suffer from low self-esteem, social isolation, and poor family dynamics. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
- Mixed race children are more likely to have health problems, high stress, smoke, and drink. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
- Interracial people cannot receive certain organ donations. http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html

2020-01-11 18:33:52 UTC  

@honey are you willing to discuss this in voice chat?

2020-01-11 18:38:16 UTC  

Also I know you haven't read these studies

2020-01-11 18:39:06 UTC  

Because they don't actually demonstrate the claims you'd need to be true for you central claim to be true.

2020-01-11 18:47:37 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665627896571756559/Screenshot_20200111-134729.png

2020-01-11 18:47:41 UTC  

For posterity

2020-01-11 18:47:56 UTC  

This would be a pretty interesting debate

2020-01-11 18:49:48 UTC  

Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health and behavior risk than those of 1 race. Nevertheless, most mixed-race adolescents are at low risk. Most of the risk items we assessed may be interpreted as related to stress, so we may therefore choose to interpret mixed race as a source of stress. We cannot identify further the source of the stress. Subsequent research can start with the assumption of greater risk for the mixed-race-identified adolescent and try to identify the sources of stress. Only then can we recommend programmatic attention to mixed-race youths. Our comparison of mixed-race-identified adolescents on family structure, parent education, GPA, and PVT shows that on these culture-related nonrisk characteristics, mixed race youths have values in-between the constituent races, confirming a mixed-race cultural experience.

2020-01-11 18:49:51 UTC  

5th study

2020-01-11 18:49:55 UTC  
2020-01-11 18:50:00 UTC  

They just lie and don't read

2020-01-11 18:50:54 UTC  

It would be fun to see you debate him though

2020-01-11 18:51:11 UTC  

They refused to get in vc

2020-01-11 18:51:20 UTC  

And text chat debates are just time wasters

2020-01-11 18:56:22 UTC  

Is he actually text cucking? Sad

2020-01-11 18:56:26 UTC  

Low energy

2020-01-11 19:32:28 UTC  
2020-01-11 20:39:07 UTC  

Horseshoe theory Redux

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665655957719875614/unknown.png

2020-01-11 20:39:14 UTC  

Doomers are the enlightened centrists

2020-01-11 21:24:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665667350787391499/Screenshot_20200109-093213_Facebook.png

2020-01-11 21:51:59 UTC  

>tfw blocked by methode for 100th time

2020-01-11 21:55:32 UTC  

it will be taken seriously by the lefties @bruno

2020-01-11 21:55:47 UTC  

you can bulli me in dm if you want tho

2020-01-11 22:01:14 UTC  
2020-01-11 22:01:25 UTC  

Yes

2020-01-11 22:01:35 UTC  

Do you have a problem with it?

2020-01-11 22:14:22 UTC  

hewwo :3

2020-01-11 22:18:33 UTC  

Lmfao

2020-01-11 22:26:12 UTC  

@LustrousMandrill not to ban this guy ^

2020-01-11 22:26:15 UTC  

2020-01-11 22:43:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665687198422532116/1576567494689.webm

2020-01-11 22:48:31 UTC  

<@&644177706367451163> accounting for lifetime costs, wind and solar are cheapest: <https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/renewable-energy/barriers-to-renewable-energy#.W-s1fN-YVuR> <https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2017/> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/642020024625922088/chart-1-finally.png However, if costs over the lifespan of energy projects are taken into account, wind and utility-scale solar can be the least expensive energy generating sources, according to asset management company Lazard. As of 2017, the cost (before tax credits that would further drop the costs) of wind power was $30-60 per megawatt-hour (a measure of energy), and large-scale solar cost $43-53/MWh. For comparison: energy from the most efficient type of natural gas plants cost $42-78/MWh; coal power cost at least $60/MWh.

2020-01-11 22:50:02 UTC  

climate change abatement that would cost just 0.4% of global GDP (less than USD350bn of about USD87trn) could reduce yearly gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions (GtCO2e) from 70 to 38 (54%) by 2030: <https://ourworldindata.org/how-much-will-it-cost-to-mitigate-climate-change> <https://www.cbd.int/financial/doc/Pathwaystoalowcarboneconomy.pdf> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/631555533752631296/Global-Potential-Abatement.png

2020-01-12 00:25:57 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665713043786694704/pbbhqr46c7a41.png

2020-01-12 00:30:29 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/649061211849097217/665714183022575617/image0.jpg

2020-01-12 01:28:22 UTC  

<@&644177706367451163> debunk this!!!