It enables our society to have viable laborers

And I'm against it

im out.

Damn

you are either

the most hardcore commie in the world

or a really dumb libertarian

either way not interested

<:OMEGALUL:648756044167643158>

What do you mean

I would never troll

or are being dumb and trolling

I assume at this point people in political discords arent and are insane.

Oh, that's a good streetlight manifesto song, btw

ty, i prefer this version, witch is a cover lmao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ9GCwMataQ

>the most hardcore commie in the world
commies forced public school on everyone

after all, the state owned them, so they had to give them education to force them to work

I've heard that one as well

Ancom dude

should have just said anarchist my bad.

@⥌鬼気⥍ The state owning everyone is actually incompatible with communism, you're thinking of fascism

@LustrousMandrill Please tell me how Communism _isn't_ fascist 😂

...

Wtf

Are you trolling lol

I'm curious what definition you use wrongly, the communism or the fascism one

coz there's no version of communism that isn't fascist

from the USSR to current China

I don't know about you, but to me a classless and stateless society seems very different from a highly authoritarian and nationalistic state

The USSR and China have never been communist societies

It seems that it's you who has the wrong definition of communism

I'm surprised, your wrong definition is of communism and not of facism. I kinda expected you to go the nazi route and say that "it isn't true fascism" if there wasn't any flavor of racial superiority to it

"a classless and stateless society seems very different from a highly authoritarian and nationalistic state"
Genius, I would like to know what made you reach such conclusion

So then our disagreement here is just on the definition of communism

you can only keep a society classless by force, and you can't do it without a state

anarcho-communism has to assume that everyone agrees with you

Why don't you give me your definition of communism if you think I've got it wrong because I don't think you'll be able to provide me with a coherent definition if you think the USSR and China are communist societies

you can't have communism without a big state, also authoritarian, otherwise it wouldn't be communism for a long time

there also is close to no private ownership, and seizing of property is a thing if the state so decides

the only version of communism that isn't fascist is an anarcho-communism where everyone agrees to play with it. It's even more of an utopia than the typical communism