well that's why we structure our society to prevent harmful actors

Well no, that was to raven

read the federalist papers

Ok, so lets go beyond that.

What if an individual is a harmful actor outside of an ideological sphere?

No, Liberty (IE the freedom from oppression) is the highest value

@CelestialMorningLight ok, so then you shouldn't let people be oppressed by gender identity

we need to destroy gender.

that's the only way to get true freedom.

@Ape It needs to be demonstrated that there *is* any oppression there to begin with

it's clear that there is.

I want to be a non gendar alien kin, and society doesn't respect that decision.

That curtails my personal freedom to be what I want.

that's oppression.

I should have ultimate freedom to do what I want.

oppression

[uh-presh-uh n]

SynonymsExamplesWord Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.comnounthe exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner.

lol, you are free to call yourself what ever you want, we have no control over other people.

Can you demonstrate that there is oppression as by the definition?

yeah, its people forcing their gender identity on others that is the problem

mandaterd pronouns, etc

Well, depends on your definition on burdensome, cruel or unjust.

At this point we're just splitting hairs

i am an attack helicopter, doesn't mean people have to respect my personal choice.

so lets say I think that society not letting me have my drivers license say "dragonkin" is burdensome.

No, I gave you the definition and now you're backpedaling

Celestial, don't be a stupid faggot.

I'm using your defintion you little winy cuck.

Lets say that people mocking me is a form of verbal abuse, and while I don't think that government should mandate people respect me, we should have social campaigns to push drankonkin acceptance and socially isolate people who disagree.

sure, you can advocate for wanting to have drgaonkin on your drivers license.

if you think that's burdensome, go create a poltical advocacy group to get the law changed.

Lets say that we as people decide to start boycotting anyone who disagree, and start driving people out of business, creating a corporate culture where only people who agree with me can thrive

SuperPACs exist.

essentially meaning that you cannot express that idea in public without getting fired.

I can't type for shit on this phone, come into voice

no

bf's home.

I'm sure he won't mind, ask him for permission

not that he'll mind

more like I don't like having autistic conversations while boo's home

Okay