Message from @Michael1800
Discord ID: 531701090119450634
Oi veh.ðŸ˜
What an absolute mad lad... I ain't cheering him on, but holy shit the brass balls on this guy.
Tbh idk what to think.
The entire article seems genuine enough. But lying is a skill some can refine.
This goes for both accusers and aggressors.
He isn't suing them because he didn't rape anyone... He's sueing them because they leaked that he for sure raped someone.
ahahahahahahahahahaha
I wonder if he possibly did do it, if us helping to support investigating him would provide some nice eyes on us?🤔
At 1:38 he talks about the #MeToo movement.😂
idk what we could do... that's a criminal investigation.
Guys and girls all say CBS is an old-fashioned place to work at.
Well, it came to mind. I am overthinking a lot atm. Debating if I should summarize this info or build it up to another 10+ page document
Offering with an FTC complaint =/= criminal investigation.
I'll let anonymous worry about it.
They are shit nowadays. Not counting when original members come back for work.
Well... When you 'assist' with a criminal investigation and you weren't somehow asked to and/or deputized... You're a vigilante.
I think you're overthinking it.
Ugh, this is soo much info. Les has done well in how he handles his accusers. The summary would literally feel unfinished given how uncertain the investigation is coming off.
The goal of the write-up on this was to show the SJWs are being manipulated into accusing any man of anyt sort of crimes in order to give credibility to a bunch of nefarious string-pullers in the background.
Just look how they tried to do Aziz Ansari.
A bad make-out session where he respected 'no' and didn't hold it against the girl was nearly used as a rape accusation to destroy his career.
True. But I feel like after some recent debates I had, that I should cover some easy to assume guilty peeps like Les and R Kelly, so I can cover how it is not just us looking at easy to disprove individuals.
Oh for sure dude... Write up the guilty with the innocent.
Even 90% success still means 1:10 guys literally dindu nuffin close to a criminal offense... Maybe creapy or cringey?
It's all the power dynamic.
Yeah...
I may make this document on Les short or long. Dependant on differing info on sources...
You could do a full write-up for the ember.
Make no mistake, those guilty should pay.
The key is making sure people realize an accusation of a crime is not a trial.
better to let 100 guilty men go free, etc. etc. etc. only here? imho the consquences are worse.
A guy robs a bank you can lock him up for 20 years and forgot he was there, he can re-make a life for him.
BUt this stuff? It destroys them.
If a woman accuses a man of raping him 30 years ago, and there is no evidence for or against it, and she swears her honesty... It's over.
He only has his strength of character to go on.
Every commitment he's kept or promise he has broken, all comes down at once.
Social justice.
Not even once.
Which makes the Bret Kavanaugh thing that much more hilarious when you think on it.
100s of women swearing he was nothing moer than the best sort of person... vs 1 crazy broad with a convaluted story.
I know. I saw it in the worst of ways and more...I just really am trying to not put in too much time on what may or may not be needed. I covered Brett Kavanaugh for 6-7 hours in my last document for that reason.
Literally just reading articles and underlining and highlighting key points of interests in the court and videos I linked.
But 92 names of accused people makes it hard to stick to one guy for too long.😂