Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 476951204765761537
Even if those numbers weren't bullshit, and the sources you provide didn't contradict them, the original method of distinguishing between species was whether or not the organisms from two groups can interbreed and, while I've seen plenty of mixed race people, I haven't seen many human-chimp hybrids. Have you?
when you just exaggerate a numbers by an order of magnitude or two they can look compelling.
Also the largest FST exists between the Lapp people, in Norway/Finland area and the Sardinians, in the mediterrenen and they're both white groups despite having the largest FST are they not?
I think you should study basic biology before try to comment on what defines different species
Imagine actually thinking black people are monkeys
Lefty: *longwinded and complex argument*
Fashie: monkeys lol
@DA GOMMIE JOO iphone venezuela 1000 gorillion holodomor
i feel like the lefty wouldnt really have the complex argument
Stepan Bandera did nothing wrong
I mean WTARGL had a good argument about inter-species breeding
and then panzer dismissed all of it with a monkey joke
>scientific argument
>lol haha monkeys
The reply I expected from a right wing intellectual
Just imagine what a edgy 3rd grader would say
It's so pathetic
@Слава Україні! Героям слава!#3444 Bandera was a mass murderer and torturer. From beginning to end all he did was betray Ukrainian people.
Imagine being this retarded
A coup d'état, eh?
Take the godpill heretics.
> Thomas Aquinas
The first three arguments are really the same. Screaming that this all couldn't just exist, that there must be something which enabled it to exist. Well, modern physics kindly disagrees. The big bang theory clearly illustrates that time started to exist, together with all other things we observe in the universe today, the moment the universe started to expand.
Besides, if god created the universe outside of that very universe, who is to say the laws of physics would operate in the same manner? And wasn't it god who created those laws of physics, those natural consistencies, to begin with? Why apply those natural consistencies to the creation of all that exists within our universe, including those consistencies? How exactly would that work? Why should it be like that? What does that even mean, in scientific terms? If god used those laws of physics to create the very universe we exist in, then who created those laws of physics? Did they just already exist, together with god in the endless abyss? What would that abyss even be? There is no time, no space, supposedly, since god created time and space, right? And if not, then that must have also existed alongside god. Would a god even be necessary at that point as an explanation as to how the universe came to be?
> The big bang theory clearly illustrates that time started to exist
This misses the point completely, what caused the big bang to happen?
His point was that you need to be able to trace all causality back to something.
And this simply can't be done in a materialistic world view.
And you also greatly misunderstand theology in your second paragraph, god is not in the physical world he is the in metaphysical world so these ideas that you would apply to the physical world don't apply to god.
<#436758397073752066>
Nothing caused the expansion of the universe to happen, since outside of the universe time, and therefore cause, does not exist.
And my point exactly is that there is no reason for the rules of the physical world to apply in the metaphysical realm where god supposedly resides.
Thomas Aquinas uses the laws existing within the universe to explain an event occurring outside the universe. This does simply not make sense.
why u ping @Deleted User
Concerning Jews and communist
I'm neither