Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 529281903107244052
so imagine syndicalism with a common council
hmm, interesting
Yeh ive got work to do.
alas, the curse of every wage slave
but corporatism doesnt dictate that the means of production has to be directly owned
cya @CapitalistCuck
it should
just that they can be controlled or regulated through state
but it can also incorporate direct state ownership of the MOP
the state shouldnt exist
its a cross between a parasite and a bully
feeding off the wealth of the people through taxation to sustain itself
forcing itself to exist through force
corporatism's basic idea was that fascists would force the classes to cooperate and remove the class divide by the state acting as the arbiter of both proletariat and bourgeoise interests and subordinating them to the national need
so they'd merge companies into blocs and have them represented by a singular entity
and so on
yeah thats what i figured from it
@Irish Princess corporatism predates the term fascists by quite a lot
where as fascism does invoke corporatism, vice versa cant be said to be true
yeah, but fascists utilized it most prominently as a third position economic model.
it was integral to the whole 'we reject capitalism and communism both' thing.
the concept of the estates general is essentially corporatism
all this talk of capitalism and communist
before the industrial revolution there weren't that many industrialists to be represented
so much debates and wars and bloodshed and complication and strife
just automate it all, lol
and who'll own the robots?
the police, the US military, boston dynamics?
the people
dur
why
cuz theyre the people
for example if I'm a programmer, should I be forced to program robots to feed into your material pleasures?
the people are the final authority
not necessarily
well who's going to do the programing? robots can't program themselves
im sure there are programmers who will be programming to feed *their own* material pleasures š
š | **ORWELL leveled up!**
so uh
are black people human?