Okay, but, again, every individual person has different biological traits. You need to be more specific than that.

even so, even if it was purely economic gains, doesnt mean whites were superior

yeah slavery was slightly used in north america cause of the tougher soil

the reason why it wasnt as popular as it was in central or south america

is because of the climate needed for sugar farming

more slaves were sent to sugar farms

slavery only increased in the north due to the cotton gin

If we're measuring purely for phenotypical markers, that's pretty shit, since phenotypes don't really translate well to underlying genetic structure. A single gene contributes up to forty percent of all melanin variation in pigmentation between Europeans and Western Africans, for example. We have tens of thousands of genes.

just bring out the pca charts

lol

in either case, argument is moot

slaverys over

we're moving on

slowly but surely

yeah, and?

does that mean we should flood all homogeneous communities with a mix of different races

soon slavery will be a footnote in history

why not?

why should we?

decreases social cohesion

K im back for a bit

Well, no.

why not?

Studies show it decreases or increases.

Depends on what you prefer.

sup capitalist

Do you support slavery in the form of gulags?

our favorite ancap

Not even an ancap lmao

it decreases social cohesion in terms of general trust and socializing, does it not?

oof ofcourse

Just a free market boi

cuz capitalism cant exist without the state

thats how shitty the system is

in terms of both trust in the government and ones neighbors

Some studies show it can, yes, but other studies say otherwise, hence I'd be very iffy making a statement on it without scientific consensus.

it needs the gov to pull it together when it flies apart

I'm not arguing either way, mind.

I'm just saying.

yall still having that racist debate?

dude social cohesion can do well in relatively homogeneous commuties under a state @Deleted User