Message from @John Mosby
Discord ID: 405813980305555466
i don't like a good chunk of the people in that poster
Episode 4 was 🔥 @Tony Hovater @MatthewHeimbach the discussion on Christianity and the story of the priest at the ancient monastery was awesome
<:basedduke:374716952343609355> thanks man
I like most...
I don't like Savitri the most.
Not a big fan of Pierce, Serrano, or David Lane.
Don't like Tommasi or Mason, either
Day 4: still sick as a dog
I wanna point out that I got sick the same day I quit smoking
@John Mosby You don't like Pierce?
everyone likes Pierce
No to David Lane? 14 words
I don't like Tommasi but i like the aesthetic of the NSLF
Mason has kinda just become a meme at this point
When I came into the Movement, you had either Pierce or Butler...I went the CI route, and disliked Pierce for his anti-working class attitudes and his anti-Christian rhetoric.
Im not saying I hate him, just never been a fan.
I never got into Lane, cuz he was anti-Christian, and the books he wrote in prison about making 14 year old prostitutes into war-brides was cringy....
I use to write to Bruce Pierce and David Tate, while they were still alive, and I LOVED them...Lane was just my least favorite of the Silent Brotherhood.
@RagBat What's poppin nigger
For the record, too, Bruce and David 100% supported the methods TWP is using...they completely disavowed revolutionary action, in this current age, due to the lack of fruits it bore back when the Silent Brotherhood adopted that model.
Who's Butler?
Christian Identity guy i guess
I never thought Pierce was anti-working class
McVeigh really fucked us
Richard Butler (founder of Aryan Nations).
Ya, Piece hated skins (which I have always been), and was shitty towards working-class guys I know who use to work on his property, cuz he viewed them as "lesser-thans", due to their economic status.
No offense to you, comrade, but I've always been repulsed by skins. it's why it took me the better part of a decade to come to the movement
nothing against you
@John Mosby I've never heard that theory but I am open to it
Skins served their purpose.
but seeing Pierce's repudiation of the skinhead movement made me feel comfortable. Obviously, you are an important constituent piece of our movement, but the aesthetic always turned me off
I don't agree with the way they operated but they did the job that white men weren't doing for decades
there's a school of thought that claims Skins to be ZOG fools
then there's another that lashes back against that idea
@Tarnfurt
I came into the skinhead movement back in 2005...this was before the skinhead culture got taken over by the druggies and degenerates...I've just held onto it (I dont really dress like a skin, though).
I always trusted skins more than other WNs, cuz they had your back, and weren't scared to fight (literally) for what they believed.
i know that now
Just not my aesthetic
i also am genuinely surprised to hear Pierce treated people like that
he wrote highly of blue collar folks in his novels
and he was always begging for them
I just know his attitudes about them from stories I heard form old school skins who use to be in NA, or worked on his property...
and he certainly was no fan of White Collar financial professionals
Obviously I don't know who you know, and I've never heard their stories. But it might have been his distaste for skins coming out, wrapped in a vehicle that was interpreted to be anti-working class
especially since at the National Alliance compound, basically everyone had to do blue collar work just to keep the place in order, including Pierce
Honestly, it was probably more that he was anti-skinhead than anti-working class...our guys just probably lumped the two together
yeah, being unable to separate the two