Message from @Kisaragi
Discord ID: 579309913369739294
Which one are you
I was spectating and narrating the story.
Hybristophilia
An undeniable proof that women are subhuman.
Is that your fap folder?
Hybristophilia is not a gendered disorder, female criminals get fan mail from crazy male fans too. Ask any of the Manson girls.
And no it's my aesthetics folder.
It's logical for women, while weies for men.
It's illogical no matter what gender it is
No.
What is evolutionary psychology/ethology/social dominance hierarchy.
Tldr you are evolved to be attracted to that.
A preference is different from hybristophilia
If you prefer dominant partners, that's very different from hybristophilia
It isn't preference.
Exactly thanks
It's a disorder
If you're attracted to killers/rapists it's a disorder
Anyone that believes in the alpha beta evolutionary biology needs to update their reading list
Dominance =/= killers rapists ALTHOUGH they cam be seem as such
That dichotomy was disproven by the same guy who pioneered it
There wasn't a one guy in the history
Yeah he wrote the book on it and tried to get people to stop believing it for years after
They've made children's YouTube videos explaining this
There wasn't only one guy who ever thought about such a concept or rather should I say managed to notice it
>youtube videos
David Mech introduced the idea of the alpha to describe behavior observed in captive animals. Alphas, he wrote in his 1970 book "The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species," win control of their packs in violent fights with other males.
But, as he outlined in a 1999 paper, he's since rejected that idea in light of research into the behavior of wolves in the wild.
In nature, Mech writes, wolves split off from their packs when they mature, and seek out opposite-sex companions with whom to form new packs. The male and female co-dominate the new pack for a much simpler, more peaceful reason: They're the parents of all the pups.
Sorry nigga
It's basic fact
Believing disproven pop science 👌
Shit like this is why when people start spouting off what women should be attracted to they inevitably sound stupid
Again, evolutionary psychology, ethology and anything about social dominance hierarchy.
That guy just got backlash and backed off not to piss normalfags because they do get pissed about this every single time
Yeah I'll believe the actual guy instead.
For the third time: there wasn't a single guy who talked something like this. There are whole branches of researchers that I mentioned.
For the umpteenth time, I pointed out this man first and foremost. You can look him up yourself.
You wouldn't have your catch phrase "alpha" if it weren't for him.
If you want to talk about what women are attracted to using bunk pop science be my guest but I'm going to think you have no idea what you're talking about. Not even bringing up hormonal influence on the female psychology of attraction and how that plays a much bigger role...pathetic.
Lol













