@everyone

Cringe and blue pilled

WE HAD A SOLID RUN, IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE SERVING WITH YOU ALL

https://youtu.be/nJQOSAgXxDQ?t=125

Ok

Minorities

Kinda lame

FUCK KIKES

Sue me for it, I've got time to hit up the SCOTUS

Reminder that 33% of supreme court justices are also jewish.

Although that could go down to 25% since Ginsburg has increasingly dire health problems.

Duel citizenship probably

gas the jews

Idk if Ginsburg has dual, but the other two I think were born in the US

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Breyer

https://themoscowtimes.com/news/were-ready-unite-with-russia-belarus-leader-lukashenko-says-64517

???? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/14/schools-france-replace-mother-father-parent-1-2-controversial/

Its only in offical school documentation and as a country that forbids the counting of religious groups and ethnic groups this fits into their idea of equality and fairness under law. Nothing new, just applying French values to a new minority

Based, in polyamorical relationships the terms "parent 3" through "parent 99" could be used as well

>minority

What minority?

H0mos

Oh

Yea it's to prevent that kinda discrimination

I thought it's more about degenderisation of the terms "mother" and "father"

Nah it was debated when the same sex marriage law was passed

Still it's kind of stupid, they aren't biological parents anyway, and I don't know how it works in France, but here it's always "mother & father/parents" or "legal guardian"

So what's the problem

With using th term "legal guardian" I mean

They could be biological parents

*one of them

One guy couldve had kids and kept them

Still

But anyway any school documentation relating to the kid could place them in a discriminatory position because they have gay parents

Its to keep the beurocracy without personal bias

I'm not really sure why there's a need for specifying either mother/father or parent1/parent2 distinction, what about kids living with one parent then?
Couldn't they just use the words "parent" and "legal guardian"?
That wouldn't sound this stupid and probably wouldn't be this controversial

Oh, okay, now I see it may be useful when filling child's data

The only people it's controversial to are homophobes lel it's not at all a big deal who cares nothing changes

I know that nothing changes
But at the moment I've read "parent 1", "parent 2" I automatically knew that people will oppose it
There may be no rational reason to do so, but humans aren't rationalistic creatures
The problem with this terms is that they seem "artificial" and people are generally afraid of things like that, especially those involving numbers, like in this case