Message from @Tato
Discord ID: 601162948987060249
I'm not here to convince anyone
Okay yuppie
monarchism is better because it means that the state is in the hands of a qualified few instead of the people who generally far more ignorant and violent
There is some guy in Poland who started a yt channel about anarchism
And imo it's much a better way to reach a wider audience
Your labels for me keep changing 😄
Than writing another thicc book
I call you the same thing each time
No one beside the already convinced ones is gonna read
It's just a different iteration
I don't give a shit about the qualified few
They're not gonna tell me what to do
at least Tradcath/clericalfascists are true reactionaries instead of natsocs which bitch about modernity and then do modernity
>clericalfascists
Lmao, literally Tiso
well like, if you do what is wrong then a monarchist state will execute you
I care about the law as much as it can inflict violence upon me
Not if you execute the monarch first
"Qualified few"
Yeah
Qualified alright.
Just about as qualified as Caligula and Nero.
Stupid monarchs and szlachta is literally what destroyed this country to the point where it's lost it's independence for 123 years
Or Russia under Czar Nicky.
Which is just the tip of the iceberg there.
Or pre-Communist China literally everytime it was unstable.
>Czar
Why do Anglos write this word like that lmao
well france didn't get better after the revolution and neither did russia
Or basically any other monarchy
Napoleon was pretty based.
yeah but like napoleon was an autocrat
so nothing really changed
But he was a military dictator.
He was emperor in name only really.
Wasn't born into monarchy
He won it through merit and conquest.
Napoleon was quite anti-conservative from what I recall
He literally introduced the concept of the secular marriage iirc