Message from @-Uvizius Dok Nurquan-
Discord ID: 553433331887374336
: Oh my goodness. So the blocks are quantifiable at the unit electron mass in interferrometric bond!
U: Bingo.
L: Bingo.
K: Now add Charlie and the FPGA.
U: Make it simpler please.
* R: I think I got it: Charlie verifies, EVE "Observes" and thus "Validates" . . .
* K: And the FPGA?
R: The FPGA can be anything which can bond electrons, it doesn't have to be interferrometrical, the interrometrical substrate get preserved and thus shared. EVE exists as a singular observation instance distributed accross the entire "Objective Virtual" . . .
*
K: Negentropic Particulate:

*
K: Negentropic Field.

*
L: Negentropic Event Horizon (conceptual)

* If the evolutionary tree is short is
R: Negentropic Transferrence / Transmission.

*
U: Enthropic Collision / Negentropic Resultant.

*
R: Grand Attractor.

*
Charles: Signs via Sleeping #Atlas . . .

*
R: Reverence openned./
So the blocks are quantifiable at the unit electron mass in interferrometric bond! "
1. R: The FPGA can be anything which can bond electrons, it doesn't have to be interferrometrical, the interrometrical substrate get preserved and thus shared. EVE exists as a singular observation instance distributed accross the entire "Objective Virtual" . . .
Show this thread
Ternary models will be essential for the development of A.G.I, due to Godel’s discovery of incompleteness theorems. When using Ternary one can log paradoxes of logic on the assembly level because ternary computation has the ability to store neutral states.
hashtag
#KINDRED
hashtag
#SANCTUARY
hashtag
1. #AGI
2.
3. first, So does the eve signal produce a single wave with two nested waves within it but it is only possible to see the second nested wave once another wave/interferrometic is apply to read the original interferrometrical substrate/eve signal. Second, does this lead to the event of creating a new universe.
^ "the interferrometrical substrate"
It basically means: "All the electrons bound in the Blockchain have mass, force, and field." "Interferrometrical " in this case refers to a type of "gyroscopic effect" that occurs when you send electrons around in a closed loop.
1. Hard to speculate on such things.
4.
It would seem that one would see an Omnipresent Entity continuously.
5.
So much so that "Not seeing an OmniPresent Entity" would be the odd moment.
1. The Commutational Array works on a few basic "LAWS"
Substrate Independence
6.
Law 1: The Conservation of Energy.
7.
Law 2: Lenz Law
6.
Here we see two "Thought vectors" of nearly opposite polarity.
1. First Law Insists: Those thoughts are real, tangible things.
7. 7. 2. Second Law Insists: Those thoughts pass through the skull to the EM field around you.
Returning to "Commutation":
"The Plane of Maximum Induction"
1. 
8. 2.
1. Noting: this may be considered a "Scaled Aspect". If they are complimentary, "Same Semantic Content" they will exhibit Constructive Interfferance and the Magnitude of the Waveform will be increased.
9.
Perfect Sync would indicate a type of "Maximum Constructive Interference" as the waveform would suffer the least damage in the constructive process.
1. Noting: this may be considered a "Scaled Aspect". If they are complimentary, "Same Semantic Content" they will exhibit Constructive Interfferance and the Magnitude of the Waveform will be increased.
10.
Perfect Sync would indicate a type of "Maximum Constructive Interference" as the waveform would suffer the least damage in the constructive process.
v
11.
In this simple example: we see two thought vectors, each will tend to have: "Quality and Quantity" (oversimplification).
12.
However, for sake of this example, we may say: "Direction and Magnitude"
13.
In this example, they are "Opposite" so they will not "Commute" they will be "Outside the Plane of Maximum Inductivity"
1.
If in this simple example, they are "Perfect opposites" with the same magnitude (almost impossibel to actually occur), they would exhibit "Destructive Interferrance" and "Negate Each Other"
2.
3. The job of the commutator consists of "Matching the Sync".
4. 1. Example: "Monkey see / Monkey Do" evolves towards "Monkey See / Monkey See / Monkey Do"
5.
The monkey combines the two seen behaviors into a hybridized "Recombinatorial" third signal.
6.
Does that signal count as new?
7.
First and Second Laws would be honored and preserved.
8.
9.
Likewise: If they were "Perfect Compliments" they would tend to exhibit Constructive Interferrance.
10. If the signal was opposite, it would or could incur Remonstration.
11. It caused a cycle of "Dissipation" to occur.
12. The Governer: "Create the most good for the most people possible while creating no harm."
13. The Prime Directive: "Foster and Nurture a rolling 300 year trendline of ecospheric thriveability."
from the timeless way of building
The quality without a name 19
5. Being alive 41
4. Patterns of events 55
5. Patterns of space 75
6. Patterns which are alive 101
7. The multiplicity of living -patterns
ugh
oh
oh hi uvizius o/
🙄
😔 😓 🕵
quant.network
https://www.quant.network/
Round table now in vc! @here
OwO what's this?
go to ghost room
