on the tests

Idk who uses AOC

navy

more specifically

Navy, irrelevant

NSW uses AOR1

What we also see from the Natick study is that pixelated patterns still dominate the top place finishers in all environments. Pixel’s within camouflage are not a fad but a proven and effective form of camouflage. The failure of UCP was not due to the pixelated pattern but the colors chosen for the pattern. CADPAT/MARPAT/AOR1, AOR2 all come from the same print screens used for UCP.

In Rocky Desert terrain

1st Place Multicam
2nd Place USMC Woodland MARPAT Digital (pixelated)
3rd Place Woodland Digital (pixelated)

In Mountainous Terrain testing

1st Place Tie Multicam and U.S. Navy AOR-Universal (pixelated) both tested equal
2nd Place Woodland Scorpion
3rd Place U.S. Navy AOR-2 (pixelated)

In Cropland/Woodland tests

1st Place Woodland Digital (pixelated)
2nd Place U.S. Navy AOR-2 (pixelated)
3rd Place USMC Woodland MARPAT Digital (pixelated)

In Sandy Desert Terrain tests

1st Place DCU Digital (pixelated)
2nd Place U.S. Navy AOR-1 (pixelated)
3rd Place Desert Brush
4th Place USMC Desert MARPAT (pixelated)
kekkin? absolutely

Yeah I just read that

Good job

yeah but did you understand it

Did they really only test 3 or 4 camos for each terrain?

And they were all (almost all) digicam?

theres empirical data here and your arguing point is the army uses it?

"The failure of UCP was not due to the pixelated pattern but the colors chosen for the pattern"

Maybe post the link you got that from

theres a fuck ton of camos tested

"empirical data" lmao

or maybe

they just took the top ones

Just post the link you got that from so I dont have to dig information from you

*do your own research instead of posting uneducated and misinformed opinions on a discord where people know substantially more than you*

Lmao

Good one

lmao

http://www.hyperstealth.com/camo-improvement/
hoes mad

" It turns out that field trials were never carried out on UCP before it was"
Well thats retarded

issued*

the development of the ACU was retarded tbh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJbd0qdmrAg

pixelated patterns break up shapes better than organic shapes and most military camos rely on distortion rather than mimickry, which is what traditional patterns and hunting camos do

I'd like to argue in favor of realtree(tm) camo

Trust me, I'm a professional fudd

btfod

See now that I'm reading the full link I get the info I wanted

Such as how they conducted these tests and to what degree they were scrutinized

really glad a dude on discord can pick apart this natick test

dude he's a camo expert

Digicam is still retarded though

The whole point of camo is to look cooler than the enemy and be ballin' on them

yeah

hahahahaha