Message from @uzidead
Discord ID: 629828361295888405
🤔
COPE
Army is using MC these days
Yes
And like I said early
maybe do some reading
Marines are dumb and still using marpat
on the tests
Idk who uses AOC
navy
more specifically
Navy, irrelevant
NSW uses AOR1
What we also see from the Natick study is that pixelated patterns still dominate the top place finishers in all environments. Pixel’s within camouflage are not a fad but a proven and effective form of camouflage. The failure of UCP was not due to the pixelated pattern but the colors chosen for the pattern. CADPAT/MARPAT/AOR1, AOR2 all come from the same print screens used for UCP.
In Rocky Desert terrain
1st Place Multicam
2nd Place USMC Woodland MARPAT Digital (pixelated)
3rd Place Woodland Digital (pixelated)
In Mountainous Terrain testing
1st Place Tie Multicam and U.S. Navy AOR-Universal (pixelated) both tested equal
2nd Place Woodland Scorpion
3rd Place U.S. Navy AOR-2 (pixelated)
In Cropland/Woodland tests
1st Place Woodland Digital (pixelated)
2nd Place U.S. Navy AOR-2 (pixelated)
3rd Place USMC Woodland MARPAT Digital (pixelated)
In Sandy Desert Terrain tests
1st Place DCU Digital (pixelated)
2nd Place U.S. Navy AOR-1 (pixelated)
3rd Place Desert Brush
4th Place USMC Desert MARPAT (pixelated)
kekkin? absolutely
Yeah I just read that
Good job
yeah but did you understand it
Did they really only test 3 or 4 camos for each terrain?
And they were all (almost all) digicam?
theres empirical data here and your arguing point is the army uses it?
Maybe post the link you got that from
theres a fuck ton of camos tested
"empirical data" lmao
or maybe
they just took the top ones
Just post the link you got that from so I dont have to dig information from you
*do your own research instead of posting uneducated and misinformed opinions on a discord where people know substantially more than you*
Lmao
Good one
lmao
" It turns out that field trials were never carried out on UCP before it was"
Well thats retarded
issued*
the development of the ACU was retarded tbh
pixelated patterns break up shapes better than organic shapes and most military camos rely on distortion rather than mimickry, which is what traditional patterns and hunting camos do
I'd like to argue in favor of realtree(tm) camo
Trust me, I'm a professional fudd
btfod
See now that I'm reading the full link I get the info I wanted