generally what happens is they record how everything was at first and then they truck everything away to analyze it
that's how crime scene investigation works
they can't just put all their equipment in a truck and drive down to the scene
name one crime scene where the investigators didn't take all the evidence they could and move it away
saying that it's "consistent with" a conspiracy is just stupid it's also "consistent with" feeding a lovecraftian monster that feeds on rubble
https://www.ae911truth.org/
so you're just gonna ignore my points about investigation
this is the site i was referring to
I will definitely take a look at this
so I'm looking at all of these claims of thermite and I'm left with a question that the site doesn't answer
so if the collapse had nothing to do with the planes, why not just fake a truck bomb instead of hijackings?
the WTC was attacked by a truck bomb in 1993 just use that again
why do you need the planes?
just fake a truck bomb and plant charges at the base of the towers it'd be far easier and more believable than fake planes
why do all of these conspiracies require the government being so damn stupid?
"why do you need the planes?" its part of the official narrative im sure you already know about this it goes something like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijackers_in_the_September_11_attacks
its not that theyre stupid its just that they believe all the public will be just like you
an not question theyre official narrative
thats one way to put it
I mean I have genuine questions about it
I just don't think any of the conspiracies adequately address them
they're shoddy and fall apart easily
"oh it was thermite" then why fake the plane crash? "oh the evidence was destroyed" yes because evidence is often destroyed after investigations see also: the destruction of firearms after criminal investigations
"oh it was an excuse to declare war" the USA doesn't need a damn terrorist attack to declare war they had the WMDs for that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein#September_11_attacks
the official story has some minor holes in it
just a coincidence goy
but the conspiracies fall apart completely when you ask questions
why use a terrorist attack for the insurance scam?
why not a fire?
minor for you because you chose to continue to believe in the shitty official narrative
because you dont wanna believe that your lovely cia that you fuck everyday are not omnipotent gods
>shitty as opposed to the narratives that can't be questioned without collapsing
look I hate the CIA as much as the next guy
arming al qaeda in the first place was fucking retarded
that can quickly kill any of their subjects that escapes from their place and people that expose their false flags
but if they were to fake a terrorist attack, then I'd like to think that they'd actually put some fucking effort into it
actually create an official story that neatly explains everything
instead of shoulder shrugs and erasure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XHm56O2NTI
jews did 9/11 and no this isnt the only proof haha
